Laserfiche WebLink
~~ <br />~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1317 Sherman St.. Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (7031 866-1567 <br />FA%:13031 87 2-8106 <br />July 26, 1995 <br />Mr. Matthew S. Hayes <br />Hayes Environmental Services <br />300 Lafayette Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80218 <br />RE: 1995 Baseline Sampling Methods for Bowie Mine No. 2 <br />Dear Mr. Hayes: <br />~~~ <br />DEPARTMEN-I' OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOU2CES <br />Roy Romer <br />covcrnor <br />~a mes S Lochhead <br />ExttuOVe DireClOr <br />Michael B. Lang <br />Drvivon Uirccror <br />The Division has reviewed your proposed methodology for conducting <br />baseline sampling at the Bowie Mine No. 2 located near the town of <br />Bowie, Colorado. Overall, the proposal is acceptable with the <br />execption of three areas that will require some clarification. <br />Below the major topics are listed with any comments. <br />Expected Number of Communities <br />The two major communities (juniper woodland and mixed shrubland) <br />which will be matched to reference areas are acceptable as <br />proposed. Initially, you were going to qualitatively sample the <br />upper meadow community as it was not large enough to be considered <br />a major community and quantitatively sample the lower meadow <br />community as a major community. However, after you initiated the <br />sampling, the upper and lower meadows were determined to be similar <br />enough that they could be lumped into one disturbed meadow <br />community as we discussed in the field. Since there are no similar <br />areas nearby that could be utilized as a reference area, the <br />proposal to develop technical based success standards for this area <br />is acceptable. <br />Proposed Methods <br />Minimum Sample Numbers- After reviewing the Land Use Guidelines <br />and the Bond Release Guidelines, both documents suggest that a <br />minimum of 15 to 20 samples be taken for baseline and bond release <br />areas and l0 for reference areas even if sample adequacy is reached <br />prior to this. You have proposed a maximum of to samples per <br />community per parameter. This should be adjusted upward for the <br />proposed communities. <br />