Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />-~- <br /> <br />VII. Protection of the Hvdrolocical Balance (2.05.6(3)). <br />The discussion of probable hydrologic consequences presented by <br />the applicant is qualitative and fails to add[eas several <br />possible hydrologic effects of the proposed operation. The <br />discussion of probable hydrologic consequences should be <br />expanded and quantified so that the Division has a clear <br />understanding of just what effects the Foidel Creek underground <br />mining operation would have on the existing hydrologic system. <br />The applicant should submit additional information for the <br />following areas of concern. <br />* 1. The applicant has provided a qualitative discussion of <br />the probable hydrologic consequences of the mining opecation <br />which addresses runoff and erosion from disturbed areas, the <br />oediment load from disturbed areas, the dissolved salt load in <br />mine discharges and possible effect on Foidel Cceek, and a <br />change in the ion balance of disturbed area surface water. The <br />applicant has not provided an assessment of other possible <br />hydrologic effects of the operation including water quantity <br />effects on the Foidel Creek drainage, and water quantity and <br />quality effects on the Fieh Creek drainage. The assessment of <br />probable hydrologic consequences needs to be expanded to <br />provide a quantitative estimate of possible effects and to <br />analyze these additional concerns. <br />y. Mine water (and possibly water from the dewaterinq well <br />w in Section 29) would be discharged to the Foidel Creek <br />stream/alluvial aquifer system. The applicant should provide a <br />Qr~ worst case estimate of the quantity and quality of this <br />~y~'I discharge, and predict the effects upon surface flow regime, <br />geomorphic stability of the stream, surface water quality. <br />alluvial water levels, and alluvial water quality. Possible <br />effects to downstream users of sucface flow or alluvial Ovate[ <br />should be considered, and mitigations proposed if appropriate. <br />The assessment should be carried downstream to the point that <br />• the changes in water quality and quantity become insignificant, <br />including an assessment of the effects on Middle Creek and <br />Trout Creek if appropriate. <br /> <br />