My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12640
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:03 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:33:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/13/1993
Doc Name
PAR FOR HG LOADOUT APPLICATION HG PEABODY C-92-081
From
DMG
To
STEVE WATHEN
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.- `' <br />seems to be no correlation to mining or previous use to account for <br />these extreme numbers. The Lewis shale is also high in metal <br />concentrations of Fe, Mo, Pb, A1, Cd and Zn, exceeding stock and <br />irrigation standards. The shale is also high in magnesium, sodium <br />and boron and manganese, often exceeding both stock and irrigation <br />standards. The alluvial water is unsuitable for any use. High SAR <br />values 23-58 are also common. <br />Minimal if any disturbance is predicted to occur to the hydrologic <br />balance at the loadout. I am satisfied at their explanation of <br />minimum impact due to operations at the loadout site. <br />Alluvial Valley Floor designation does not exist in the main areas; <br />Section 14 and 15 of the loadout site. These areas have been <br />designated as dryland areas and are not subirrigated nor <br />potentially flood irrigable. The northwest corner of Section 23 <br />and part of the permit area is designated an AVF due to the <br />presence of hydrophytes in the Dry Creek channel. According to the <br />study conducted by Keammerer Consultants, the impact of the loadout <br />in this area will not substantially alter, prevent or preclude any <br />irrigation potential in this small area. <br />In conclusion, I can find no concerns on the above sections that <br />have not been addressed in the permit application or referred to in <br />the Seneca II-W permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.