My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12574
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12574
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:59 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:32:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
9/18/1992
Doc Name
FRUITA HYDROLOGY FINDINGS C-81-015
From
MLRD
To
JANET BINNS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The stretch of Big Salt Wash below Ruby Lee and above Highline <br />canal appears more intermittent than perennial. Stock tanks in the <br />area intercept much of runoff near the stream. Below Highline <br />Canal, return flows of irrigation water create a sustained flow in <br />Big Salt Wash again. I do not know how much, if any, of this water <br />is taken out of the wash and used again but, this is more than l0 <br />miles downstream from the mine. The only impact the mine could <br />have would be due to sediment pond discharges (which have not <br />occurred for several years) which would have to flow down Dry Gulch <br />for three miles before entering Big Salt Wash and flowing another <br />7 or 8 miles to get past the Highline Canal. If there is a storm <br />big enough to create that amount of pond discharge, impacts from <br />the reclaimed mine site would be impossible to detect amidst the <br />other damages from the storm runoff. <br />c:\wp51\1r918 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.