Laserfiche WebLink
'~.r • <br />Bgian Munson <br />June 12, 1981 <br />Page 2 <br />14. The printing on the page for 2.04.11(1) has been cut off to the detriment <br />of about 3 words along the right margin. <br />15. Check out 2.04.10(5) regarding their response to the loadout/tipple <br />area issue. <br />16. You and 2 need to get together with Mike S. to talk about some of the <br />vegetation issues. <br />17. You better check out 2.04.9(c)(ii). I don't think they answered your <br />questions very well. <br />18. I don't think they answered question 2.04.9(1)(c) very well either. <br />19. They skipped over 2.04.7 Sin their responses. <br />20. Concerning the questions in 2.04.7 2 H-G has submitted tables that <br />reference location, contents and sample dates of their water monitoring data. <br />For the most part, they do not address the parameters that you said were lacking. <br />2l. H-G has not provided any information on coordinating drill hole data <br />with corresponding map locations as requested in 2.04.6(1)(b)(i)(c1. <br />22. Is map No. 41 good enough for question 2.04.6(1)(b)(i)(oJ ? <br />23. K-G has not provided a sampling location map or sampling intervals in <br />response to question 2.04.6(1)(b)(i). <br />24. The nature and depth of the coal and over-, inter-, and underburden may <br />not be clearly enough illustrated on the geology map and cross-sections, <br />Exhibits Y and Z. Check into it. <br />25. I think the response to 2.03.9 is okay, but you can check it out. <br />26. Items that are forthcoming according to the responses from H-G. <br />a. Reference area selection study for loadout. <br />b. Wildlife mitigation plan. <br />c. Map of management plan for range and grazing. <br />d. Exhibit D being redrawn. <br />e. Geotechnical analysis. <br />f. Overburden swell. <br />g. Chemical and physical study of each stratum of over-, inter-, and <br />underburden. <br />