Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' revegetation success standard for this area. In our discussions with the <br />Division we have been informed that 1,000 stems per acre represents an <br />acceptable success standard based upon relevant site specific conditions. <br />' Further support for the use of 1,000 stems per acre may be derived. <br />From the data presented by Dan Mathews at the Western Reclamation Workshop, <br />May 17, 1982 in a paper titled "Post-mining Utility - A Basis Eor Woody <br />Plant Density Standards in Northwest Colorado", in which Mr. Matthews <br />observes that winter range in critical winters is the most limiting factor <br />to deer and elk po`ulations. The areas being mined at CYCC are not utilized <br />' in the winter by either deer or elk. Mr. Mathews recommends that in <br />non-critical areas, woody plant density standards should be designed to <br />provide protective cover. In his review, he reported deer utilizing open <br />areas up to 400 yards Erom protective cover and elk up to 500 yards. Deer <br />t and elk have been observed in the vicinity of the mine utilizing large open <br />wheat fields and reclaimed areas. <br />1 Because the reclaimed lands are non-critical for wildlife, the minimum <br />woody plant density of 1 000 stems per acre will be adequate to provide <br />protective cover for deer and elk and is proposed as the approved woody <br />' plant density standard on the reclaimed land at CYCC. <br />' 3. In reponse to special stipulation number 9, the permitee provided <br />diversity values for each community using the Shannon-Weiner index. With ~ ~ <br />respect to the data, what constitutes a major species? Also, in the repsonse,i~ <br />the permittee states that an acceptable method for employing the diversity ~':t <br />' component in the revegetation success evaluation has not, at present, been ~ <br />finalized, and no objective interpretation has been included in this report. A ~i,, <br />species diversity evaluation method must be included in the permit application. ~ <br />RESPONSE: <br />1 ~~° <br />' Colorado Yampa proposes a diversity standard designed to reflect recently <br />proposed revisions to OSM revegetation regulations as published in the <br />Federal Register, Vol. 47, No. 56, Tuesday, March 23, 1982. In the <br />proposed rules, the term "diverse", with respect to postmining revegetation <br />' success is defined to mean: <br />"Sufficiently varied amounts and types of vegetatioa to achieve ground <br />cover and support the postmining land uses. The precise numbers <br />required to achieve this diversity should be determined by regional <br />climatic and soil conditions. Aowever, the ultimate test will be the <br />sufficiency of the plant communities to assure survival of adequate <br />number and varieties to achieve the postmining land use and the re- <br />quired extent of ground cover. Diversity does not necessarily mean <br />that every species or variety of premising grass, shrubs, or trees be <br />' reestablished in identical numbers and ratios after mining." <br />' In order to determine a diversity standard based on the regional climatic <br />and soils conditions, a careful examination of the average species compo- <br />sitions of the five natural plant communities occurring within the <br />2 <br />