My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12274
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12274
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:38 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:28:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981021
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
11/2/1979
Doc Name
BOURG COAL STRIP OUR FN 79-125
From
MLR
To
FLATIRON PAVING CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />stitch Simmons <br />Yovember 2, 1979 <br />In addition [o a map of topsoil salvage depl-hs, the operator is required <br />to explain in detail the proposed sequence of topsoil salvage operations, <br />as well as topsoil stockpiling and replacementrin relation to the mine <br />plan. A description of topsoil salvage from the haul roads, office, <br />sedimentation ponds, dumps, and weathered coal stockpile is also required. <br />A number of contradictory and unacceptable statements regarding topsoil <br />salvage appear in the application. These follocr: <br />1. On Page 12R, the applicant states that soil will be salvaged only in <br />the draws, and that no soil will be salvaged from the Knolls and <br />ridges. This is unacceptable. Baseline soils information provided <br />by the applicant indicate that suitable topsoil is present on the <br />knolls and ridges. <br />2. The quantity of topsoil to be salvaged is specified as 144,000 BCY at <br />some points in the application (Table 3A, pp. SR and 9) and as 210,000 <br />BCY at others (p g. 12R). This discrepancy must be resolved. The <br />specified topsoil volume must be based on topsoil salvage depths. <br />(\3.1 This office cannot approve the replacement of four feet of topsoil <br />tel./ above the compacted clay membrane adjacent to Piann Draw. Amore ,eft, <br />uniform distribution of available topsoil on the reclaimed surface <br />would better achieve the goals of revegetation. Please adjust the <br />proposed topsoil replacement depths to reflect this change. <br />4~. If the applicant still crishes to attempt to create a wet meadoca <br />adjacent to Hfann Draw through the use of a clay membrane, the staff <br />would suggest burying this membrane to a greater depth (perhaps <br />8 feet?) with overburden material. Topsoil should then be replaced <br />on the overburden. <br />5. The information in Table 3A indicates that topsoil mill be salvage.cl <br />only during the first three years of mining. If this table is <br />correct, this would indicate that topsoil will not be salvaged in the <br />East Dump area. Please correct this apparent error in a detailed, <br />comprehensive topsoil salvage program. <br />6. The statement appears on page 12R that saline and sodic soils on the <br />proposed site of the Horseshoe Dump will not be salvaged. This is <br />unacceptable. At least 6" of this c~at.crial must be salvaged, but it <br />should be stockpiled and replaced separately from the other soils. The <br />s[aff crould be glad to discuss this in greater detail with you. <br />(cont'd) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.