My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12258
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:38 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:28:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
11/5/1982
Doc Name
FOIDEL CREEK UNDERGROUND MINE SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY ADEQUACY REVIEW RULES 2.04.7 & 2.05.6 3
From
MLR
To
SANDY EMRICH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• -2- • <br />2. Rule 2.05.6(3)(b)(iv) - The applicant has provided a qualitative <br />discussion of the probable hydrologic consequences of the mining <br />operation which addresses runoff and erosion from disturbed areas, <br />the sediment Zoad from disturbed areas, the dissolved salt Zoad in <br />mine discharges and possible effect on Foidel Creek, and a change <br />in the idn balance of disturbed area surface water. The applicant <br />has not provided an assessment of other possible hydrologic effects of <br />the operation including, water quantity effects on the Foidel Creek <br />drainage, and water quantity and quality effects on the Fish Creek <br />drainage. The assessment of probable hydrologic consequences needs <br />to be expanded to provide a quantitative estimate of possible effects <br />and to analyze several additional concerns. <br />Mine water (and possibly water from the dewatering well in Section 29) <br />would be discharged to the Foidel Creek stream/alluvial aquifer system. <br />The applicant should provide a worst case estimate of the quantity and <br />quality of this discharge, and predict the effects upon surface flow <br />regime, geomorphic stability of the stream, surface water quality, <br />alluvial water levels, and alluvial water quality. Possible effECts <br />to downstream users of surface flow or alluvial water should be <br />considered, and mitigations proposed if appropriate. <br />The underground mine workings would intercept ground water currently <br />flowing toward Twentymile Park, and discharging to the Fish Creek <br />stream/,alluvial aquifer system. The applicant should provide an <br />analysis showing the extent to which flow would be decreased in the <br />Fish Creek system. This could be approached by first assessing the <br />quantity and relative significance of the flow passing through the <br />potentially affected area, and then predicting the effect of intercepting <br />this water and discharging i't to the Foidel Creek drainage. Possible <br />effects to the downstream users of surface flow and alluvial ground <br />water should be considered, and mitigations proposed if appropriate. <br />The reestablishment of natural ground water movement, post-mining, <br />would cause a plume of degraded ground water to migrate towards <br />Twentymile Park and discharge to the Fish Creek stream/alluvial <br />aquifer system. As a result, water quality in the Fish Creek system <br />could be altered. The permit application contains a qualitative <br />discussion concerning the migration of this plume, but that assessment <br />needs to be quantified to verify the applicant's conclusions. If the <br />quantitative assessment indicate that water quality in the Fish Creek <br />system would be affected, possible effects to downstream users should <br />be evaluated, and appropriate mitigations proposed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.