Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• -2- • <br />2. Rule 2.05.6(3)(b)(iv) - The applicant has provided a qualitative <br />discussion of the probable hydrologic consequences of the mining <br />operation which addresses runoff and erosion from disturbed areas, <br />the sediment Zoad from disturbed areas, the dissolved salt Zoad in <br />mine discharges and possible effect on Foidel Creek, and a change <br />in the idn balance of disturbed area surface water. The applicant <br />has not provided an assessment of other possible hydrologic effects of <br />the operation including, water quantity effects on the Foidel Creek <br />drainage, and water quantity and quality effects on the Fish Creek <br />drainage. The assessment of probable hydrologic consequences needs <br />to be expanded to provide a quantitative estimate of possible effects <br />and to analyze several additional concerns. <br />Mine water (and possibly water from the dewatering well in Section 29) <br />would be discharged to the Foidel Creek stream/alluvial aquifer system. <br />The applicant should provide a worst case estimate of the quantity and <br />quality of this discharge, and predict the effects upon surface flow <br />regime, geomorphic stability of the stream, surface water quality, <br />alluvial water levels, and alluvial water quality. Possible effECts <br />to downstream users of surface flow or alluvial water should be <br />considered, and mitigations proposed if appropriate. <br />The underground mine workings would intercept ground water currently <br />flowing toward Twentymile Park, and discharging to the Fish Creek <br />stream/,alluvial aquifer system. The applicant should provide an <br />analysis showing the extent to which flow would be decreased in the <br />Fish Creek system. This could be approached by first assessing the <br />quantity and relative significance of the flow passing through the <br />potentially affected area, and then predicting the effect of intercepting <br />this water and discharging i't to the Foidel Creek drainage. Possible <br />effects to the downstream users of surface flow and alluvial ground <br />water should be considered, and mitigations proposed if appropriate. <br />The reestablishment of natural ground water movement, post-mining, <br />would cause a plume of degraded ground water to migrate towards <br />Twentymile Park and discharge to the Fish Creek stream/alluvial <br />aquifer system. As a result, water quality in the Fish Creek system <br />could be altered. The permit application contains a qualitative <br />discussion concerning the migration of this plume, but that assessment <br />needs to be quantified to verify the applicant's conclusions. If the <br />quantitative assessment indicate that water quality in the Fish Creek <br />system would be affected, possible effects to downstream users should <br />be evaluated, and appropriate mitigations proposed. <br />