My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12152
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12152
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:30 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:27:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981026
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Name
CANADIAN STRIP MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN WYOMING FUEL CO - TECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />channel (Figure 3, Addendum I of the permit aplication). Along <br />Bolton Draw, this alluvium has been identified as an alluvial <br />valley floor. Here, along North Fork, that determination cannot <br />easily be made. <br />The alluvial deposits are approximately 100-200 feet wide at <br />this location comprising approximately 10 acres (Exhibit 2, Vol. <br />1 of the permit application). Alluvium here is distinguished <br />from that in upper North Fork because it represents an alluvial <br />water table that is potentially continuous along all of Bolton <br />Draw. Subirrigation is also suggested by water levels of 6 to 10 <br />feet below ground level measured in Well 2. Although the <br />applicant did not identify vegetation or soil mottling indicative <br />of su.birrigation, the extent of investigations in this particular <br />area is unclear (p. 109-112, Vol.l and Figure 3 of the permit <br />application). The OSM June 11, 1980 AVF Guidelines have not set <br />a particular minimum groundwater level for consideration of <br />Subirrigation, but studies referenced in that report (Preamble, <br />p.12) indicate that the potential exists at levels similar to <br />those measured in Well 2. <br />As discussed for North Fork within the permit area, regional <br />precedence does not exist for flood irrigation on acreage of this <br />size. However, this area could be considered as an upstream <br />extension of the AVF below the stockpond. In that case, some <br />precedence does exist for irrigation of this more extensive <br />acreage, as discussed under the section on Bolton Draw in this <br />part of the TEA. <br />This unit of alluvium will not be physically disrupted by <br />mining at Canadian Strip, therefore, continuing collection of <br />~~ data at Well 2 is sufficient for monitoring mining impacts to <br />~p° this potential AVF. If future mining activities are anticipated <br />in this area, further investigations are needed to determine the <br />extent of effective Subirrigation and to define the hydraulic <br />connection between this alluvium along North Fork and that below <br />the stockpond. <br />_87_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.