My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12117
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:27 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:26:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/5/1978
Doc Name
EXHIBIT A DPC ADEQUACY REVIEW RSPONSE LETTER
From
ENERGY FUELS CORP
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• No requirements were placed upon Energy Fuels to <br />conduct tests on overburden to determine the acid-formin<: or <br />toxic-producing properties .• however, subsequent tests ha:•e <br />.been conducted in adjacent strata through the same geolocic <br />• strata: Results of these analysts reveal no acid or tox_c- <br />producing agents present in any of the strata examined. <br />2. Topsoiling <br />A brief description has already been given on Y;o:a <br />the topsoil :•ias salvaged prior to stripping of the coal. <br />Topsoil eras reapplied usii:g tractors with the topsoil be?.^.g <br />pushed uphill until a uniform ti:icF;Hess was achieved. Si^ce <br />the spoil grading was done with Lra:oler tractors, a fairl:• <br />rough boundary existed between the topsoil and tl:e leveler <br />spoil_ The approximate depth of surface and subsurface <br />topsoil .that was applied was two feet, with topsoil in s.._~e <br />depressions on the area being deposited to a greater dep==. <br />the topsoil was stockpiled approximately 18 months prior :.o <br />reapplication. <br />The soil series covering this site prior to miming <br />has been identified as a Buckley Silty Clay Loam. Accorcing <br />to the Soil Survey Interpretations obtained from the Soi'_ <br />Conservation Service, this soil is unsuited for use as a <br />topsoil. Potential uses for reseeding are classi°ied as <br />poor to very poor primarily due to the high clay content. <br />Soils with such high percentages of clays commonly have lcw <br />permeability rates, high shrink-swell potentials and rer.4er <br />seedlings vulnerable to mortality due to the frost-hea:•i-3 <br />action of the soils. <br />Final leveling of the topsoil was done by a <br />motorgrader to achieve a uniform seedbed prior to reseeding. <br />3. Revegetation <br />Following the leveling of the topsoil, the area <br />• was seeded with a mixture recommended by the Soil Conser:•- <br />ation Service. The mixture that was recommended to Enercy <br />Fuels was: <br />Seed Mixture <br />Species Lbs/Acre <br />Amur Intermediate S~Theatgrass 10 <br />Manchar Smooth IIrome 10 <br />• Ranger Alfalfa 2 <br />Total ~ lbs. <br /> <br />r-F,;,; ; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.