Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />R=MROCK COAL COMPANY ~~Ta(~~~~~ <br />MINkI~ LAND <br />RECiAMATION DIVISION <br />October 24, 1989 <br />MR. James O. Stevens <br />Senior Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />215 Oentennial building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 <br />Dear Mr. Stevens: <br />Submitted herewith is the following information based on <br />your letters of April 25 and June 7, 1989. <br />(1) Under Rule 2.03.4(5) Uxnership Map 8 is revised and <br />enclosed. <br />to be 38 acres. <br />(2) Under Rule 2.04.6(1)(b)(i) the Permit Area is calculated <br />The sediment pond and dam is------------------ ---- 1.97 ac <br />The facilities and haul road---------- -- ---- 3.0 ac <br />Top soil storage and road--------------------- ---- 1.1 ac <br />West Pit-------------------------------------- ---- 7.23 ac <br />East Pit--------------------------------------- --- 6.58 ac <br />These calculated areas will be <br />T_t should be noted the sediment <br />and only half of the facilities <br />total acres to be reclaimed. <br />Total Disturbed Area 19.78 sc <br />used throughout the application. <br />pond will remain as a stock pond <br />will be reclaimed leaving 16.41 <br />(3) Pule 2.04.7.(1) A copy of Table 3 A is enclosed. Four <br />additional water analysis sheets have been added to the sheets <br />already submitted. <br />(4) Rule 2.04.7(2) During the year additional water samples were <br />taken there was no surface water that could be collected. This <br />statement is reflected in the text. Under this rule in the June <br />letter the EGE designation en ground water samples was deleted <br />from Table 3 A and Montoya Dug Well was substituted. <br />The second paragraph can be resolved in the text of 2.05.3(4) <br />and Map 12, Exhibits U, KK, LL. and MM. <br />(5) Rule 2.05.3.4 was prepared by Greg Lewicki, a consulting <br />