My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11863
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11863
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:10 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:24:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/27/1980
Doc Name
OSM REVIEW OF PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS
From
OSM
To
SUNLAND MINING CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />... . ~ <br />LI .,~.,y,,ak; .. <br />}Ivdrologic Balance - Apex No. 2 ~ , <br />Plinor Modification ~~"E~`~ <br />I. Constructior. of Setting Pond <br />Sunland has committed to construct a sedimentation pond large enough to <br />ronta i.n a total volume, including sediment, of 32,700 cubic feet. F;u no Ef Erom <br />the 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event from the 5.6 acres contributing to <br />the pond is 15,246 cubic feet. This was calculated using the procedures <br />outlined in '"Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado" and "Urban <br />Hydrology for Smai.l [Jatersheds", both published by Che Soil Conservation <br />Service. The sediment volume required is 17,424 cubic fee[, determined using <br />0. 1 acre-feet per acre of disturbed area. The arr_a to be disturbed totals <br />four acres, and the calculations are therefore correct. The [oral volume of <br />runoff and sediment totals 32,670 r_ubic feet. The pond is designed for 32,700 <br />cubic Ecet, thus making its size aden~iate to contain [he total runoff. fro{n Che <br />10-year, 24-hour storm. <br />II. Construction of Ditches into and Discharge Facilities From <br />Settling Pond <br />Collector ditches !dos. D1L and D1~ cuncentr.ate runoff from the disturbed <br />area ^nd route it to the sedimentation pond. Both are designed to convey the <br />calculated runoff volumes to the pond w~i.th velocities of three feet per second <br />or less. These calculations and design criteria have been checked and found <br />to be correct. <br />Dive n;ion ditch Nc. D10 is designed Co route runoff from Basin No. 1 (an <br />undisCucbed area} around the disturbed area and cventua.l.ly .into Trout Creek. <br />1'he to[a.1 surface runoff Erom the basin has been calculated to be 12.5 cfs, <br />which is correct. However, giver, this volume and the design criteria <br />presented in the mine plan, the velocities calculated are too exit@me and will <br />probably cause excessive channel erosion. A velocity of. 10.4~feet per second <br />is way too high [n establish a stable channel. Therefore, this diversion <br />ditch, No. D10, needs to be redesigned to transport the calculated runoff at <br />an acceptable velocity. The publication to reference is Open-Channel <br />Hydraulics by Ven Te Chow, 1959, pgs. 21 and 165. The material in which the <br />ditch is to be constructed must he identified to help determine the maximum <br />permi.sia6le velocity. All of this i.nformatinn needs to he snbmitte_d [o OSi~f <br />fur review. The sedimentation pond dewatering system, .including the emergency <br />spillway design, has been found to he adequate. The four inch E.iherglass <br />riewatering pipe will. safely pass the 10-year, 24-hoar runoff. volume while <br />achieving the minimum theoretical detention time. The emergency spillway is <br />designed to pass 9. .6 cEs, while the ,equi.red dis4harge for peak flow from the <br />25-year, 24-iieur storm is 9.0 cfs. <br />..-,~y~,. .. ' <br />y~ <br />- , - - -_ - ~.y - - ..~~...ti~.~._~.wr~-~:f~9 ~ .~ ~. ,:L_ v iA:wi'~~.3J~CW.it'!~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.