My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11799
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11799
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:08 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:24:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/17/1983
Doc Name
CYCCS RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY REVIEW FOIDEL CREEK MINE
From
MLRD
To
SANDY EMRICH & ED BISCHOFF
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
._ <br />-9- <br />Surface and Ground Water Monitor:lng <br />1) The applicant was requested to commit to establishing <br />its own upstream monitoring station on Foidel Creek <br />should the USGS discontinue their station. The <br />applicant has identified his own monitoring station on <br />upper Foidel Creek. The 'applicant's response is <br />satisfactory. <br />2) The applicant has corrected the inconsistances in the <br />identification of surface water monitoring stations. <br />3) The applicant was requested to expand his proposed <br />effluent water quality monitoring to include those <br />water quality constituents for which the Colorado <br />Department of Health has established numerical stream <br />standards. The applicant has responded that the <br />Department of Health is requiring CYCC only to meet <br />the effluent limitations of their existing NPDES <br />Permits. The applicant has, however, added all of the <br />water quality parameters included in the Division's <br />September 1982 Baseline Water Quality Guideline. This <br />guideline includes many of the same water quality <br />parameters. (This concern remains unresolved.). <br />Items 4, 5, and 6 relate to ground water monitoring <br />and should be reviewed by Roy. <br />VIII. Alluvial Va11eY Floors <br />Foidel Creek <br />Although not required in our preliminary adequacy review, the <br />applicant has chosen to provide additional information and <br />discussion with regard to the proposed Alluvial Valley Floor <br />determination for Foidel Creek. <br />1) The applicant points out that the second area of <br />unconsolidated streamlaid deposits along Foidel Creek <br />is outside of the permit area and Ss not on the CYCC <br />property, therefore no emperical data exist. The <br />applicant should be reminded that he is responsible <br />for providing sufficient information to make the <br />required determinations for the permit area and <br />ad]acent areas. The Division will attempt to make the <br />required findings using information now available. <br />Conservative assumption may be used to fill data <br />gaps. However, if critical data gaps exist, the <br />applicant is responsible for providing sufficient <br />information. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.