My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11799
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11799
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:08 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:24:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/17/1983
Doc Name
CYCCS RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY REVIEW FOIDEL CREEK MINE
From
MLRD
To
SANDY EMRICH & ED BISCHOFF
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-2- <br />full extent of possible hydrologic effects has not been <br />defined. Until those hydrologic effects ate better understood, <br />the Division cannot determine which effects might require <br />mitigation in terms of alternative water supply. <br />3) The applicant has provided the information requested <br />concerning irrigation ditches along Fish Creek and <br />Foidel Creek. <br />VII. Protection of the Hvdroloaic Balance <br />1) This item made two requests of the applicant, that the <br />discussion of probable hydrologic consequences be <br />quantified, and that analysis be provided for specific <br />additional concerns (items 2-5). The applicant has <br />responded by providing a quantitative analysis of <br />those items specifically requested. The applicant has <br />not quantified those surface water effects identified <br />in the original discussion of probable hydrologic <br />consequences. For some of those surface water <br />effects, quantification may not be possible or <br />appropriate. However, given the Division's concerns <br />about salt loading in the area, the increase in total <br />dissolved solids in runoff from the permit area (p. <br />2.05-55), and its effect upon receiving streams needs <br />to be quantified. (This applies to sources other than <br />the discharge of mine water from underground <br />workings.) Quantification of this effect should be <br />possible using the results of the applicants surface <br />water and NPDES monitoring. <br />(Sandy, you should check with Roy to see if he is <br />satisfied with the quantification of ground water <br />effects.) <br />2) Item two made several requests concerning the effect <br />of the discharge of water from underground workings to <br />the Foidel Creek stream/alluvial aquifer system. The <br />applicant was requested to provide a worst case <br />estimate of the quantity and quality of this <br />discharge. The applicant has identified a worst case <br />discharge of 650 gpm having a total dissolved solids <br />concentration of 800 mg/1. Although total dissolved <br />solids is an important indicator of overall water <br />quality, it does not, by itself, fully describe the <br />quality of the discharge. The applicant should <br />provide a full suite chemistry of the anticipated <br />discharge. This could be obtained from the discharge <br />records of nearby underground mines. The applicant <br />should also provide documentation for the selection of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.