My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11746
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11746
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:04 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
7/6/1996
Doc Name
BOWIE 2 MINE ADEQUACY RESPONSE 1 GEOTECHNICAL SUBSIDENCE ADEQUACY COMMENTS PN C-96-083
From
DMG
To
DAVE BERRY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Dave Berry <br />Bowie No. 2 Geotechnical Adequacy Responses <br />page 4 <br />the toe of the waste pile, material "4", were also deduced from SPT blow <br />count conversions. <br />WESTEC's stability analysis of the proposed Bowie No. 2 mine's coal waste <br />pile determined the overall static slope stability safety factor of the <br />structure to be 1.54. This calculated static safety factor (SSF) narrowly <br />exceeds the required value of 1.5. If the ultimate waste pile volume, in <br />excess of 225,000 cubic yards of combined waste, coverfill and topsoil <br />were to fail, it could compromise the function and integrity of the <br />sediment pond adjacent to the waste pile toe, and it might compromise <br />the drainage facilities adjoining State Highway 133 and subject the public <br />to an health and safety risk. For this reason the Division requested that <br />BRL obtain samples of each of the three earthen material for which <br />WESTEC assumed strength parameters and determine those properties by <br />appropriate laboratory testing. Based upon its "experience with similar <br />materials in this region, its belief that it considered "conservative <br />saturation condition of all of its foundation materials" in performing the <br />stability analyses, and its opinion that the required SSF value of 1.5 is <br />"relatively high", BRL declined to conduct any additional testing or to <br />perform sensitivity-style stability analyses. <br />Subsequent to the Division's issuance of its adequacy comments for the <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine application, BRL submitted a "Preliminary Geotechnical <br />Study" of the surface facilities area performed by Maxim Technologies, <br />Inc., as a subcontractor to Morrison Knudsen, Inc. Having identified the <br />proliferation of mass wasting problems throughout the proposed surface <br />facilities area, Maxim performed extensive boring, sample collection and <br />laboratory testing of materials at the site. Maxim characterized the <br />general colluvial materials encountered throughout the site as a "Lean <br />Clay with Gravel (CL-GC)", observing that "the majority of the overburden <br />materials at this site can be described as a matrix of silty lean clay <br />supporting scattered to numerous fragments of sandstone." WESTEC <br />referred to the corresponding colluvial cover on the processing refuse pile <br />site as "the colluvial sandstone above the Mancos Shale". <br />WESTEC chose to convert from blow count observation conducted during <br />penetration sampling, using procedures outlined by Peck, et. al. (1974) and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.