Laserfiche WebLink
<br />191. Acquisition and utilization of a Madge Rotocleaz improves Lorencito Coal Company's <br />potential for successfully re-establishing shrub species on the reclaimed site. As stated <br />previously, the Division has observed numerous mine sites that have had varying shrub <br />establishment success throughout the state. Operations that have relied primarily on <br />inclusion of shrub seed in a grass/forb seed mix as the sole method for shrub re- <br />establishment have had limited success. Observation of a mine site east of Trinidad with <br />a similaz habitat to the Lorencito property included shrub seed in the grass/forb seed mix. <br />Three growing seasons following seeding limited numbers of rabbitbrush aze found on <br />the site, no mountain mahogany have been noted, and occasional winterfat have been <br />observed. <br />The Division's observation has shown that seeding the shrub seed sepazately from a <br />grass/forb seed mix has a higher probability of shrub success. The Division continues <br />to question Lorencito's proposal to seed shrubs directly with the grass/forb mix. If <br />Lorencito Coal Company maintains that this seeding method will achieve the proposed <br />revegetation standazd, the Division is willing to allow a field trial initiated within the first <br />permit term that would demonstrate that this seeding method is a viable method for <br />achieving successful woody plant establishment (Rule 4.15.6(3)). Should the Rotocleaz <br />be used or an alternative to establishing shrub species be proposed, a field trial may not <br />be necessary. <br />192. The Division requested that Lorencito Coal Company describe methods to be used in the <br />measurement of vegetation sampling data, Rule 4.15.7(2)(b). One purpose of this <br />description of methodology is to assure that baseline sampling is collected in similaz <br />fashion to post-mining vegetation success sampling, and to clazify questions inherent to <br />specifics in the sampling. Lorencito Coal Company provided the Division with a detailed <br />description of woody plant density baseline sampling in the cover letter. However, to <br />assure that this important information is not lost over the span of active mining and <br />reclamation liability time frame (perhaps 15-20 yeazs duration), this description needs to <br />be incorporated into the permit text. Page 2.05-73 needs additional detail to describe <br />methodology of how baseline woody plant density information was collected and how this <br />information will be collected for determination of revegetation success. <br />195. The Division reviewed Lorencito Coal Company's proposed seed mix and found that the <br />proposed grassland seed mix, Table 2.05.4-2, contains a low proportion of warm season <br />grass seed. The Division questioned Lorencito Coal Company as to how this seed mix <br />will provide a suitable seed source for compliance with Rules 4.15.1(1), 4.15.3(2). Since <br />portions of the reclaimed grassland will have rangeland wildlife as the post-mining land- <br />use, compliance with Rule 4.18(5)(1), must be demonstrated. The Division believes that <br />a higher proportion of warm season grasses should be included in the grassland seed mix. <br />Lorencito Coal Company stated that the landowners have requested that fewer warm <br />season grasses be re-established in the reclaimed azeas than were present in the pre-mining <br />community. The Division reviewed Exhibit 17, (letter from the landowners), regarding <br />disposition of roads, post-mining topography, land-use change, and reduction in shrubs <br />to be re-established on the reclaimed grassland azeas. This letter does not address a <br />