My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11706
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:03 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:22:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/27/1997
Doc Name
LORENCITO CANYON MINE PN C-96-084 NEW PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW OF FIRST ADQUACY RESPONSE
From
DMG
To
GREYSTONE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Road drainage <br />Jeff Canyon Haulroad <br /> <br />The Division believes the inflow to culvert 124+79 would be 223.5 cfs rather than <br />156.71. Please review and correct. <br />Cow to R portals <br />The following original questions still apply: <br />' culvert at 333+92, calculations say 30", table says 24" <br />' culvert at 333+92, 24" size is inaccurate <br />Rule 4.05.10 Undereround Mine Entrv & Access Discharge <br />The response to question 165 is adequate. The application is in compliance with Rule 4.05.10. <br />Rule 4.05.13 Surface and Groundwater Monitoring <br />Under this section, all responses were found adequate except as listed below. <br />167. This response is inadequate. Please refer to the original question and review spring <br />names, locations, and proposed mine plan. <br />Rule 4.05.18 Stream Buffer Zones <br />The response to question 174 is adequate. The application is in compliance with Rule 4.05.18. <br />Rule 4.06 Toasoil <br />The response to question 175 is adequate. The application is in compliance with Rule 4.06. <br />Rule 4.08 Use of Explosives <br />Under this section, all responses were found adequate except as listed below. <br />178. The applicant's response needs some additional wording. The application has been <br />revised (page 2.05-37) to include a commitment to provide oral notices to all persons <br />within one-half mile of the blasting pile when blasting occurs at unscheduled times. This <br />section of the permit should also include a commitment to comply with the requirements <br />of Section 4.08.4(1)(b)(iii) regazding any potentially necessary night blasting reports. <br />Rule 4.09 Disaosal of Excess Spoil <br />183. Resolution of this issues will likely come through satisfying a stipulation to the permit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.