My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11706
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:03 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:22:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/27/1997
Doc Name
LORENCITO CANYON MINE PN C-96-084 NEW PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW OF FIRST ADQUACY RESPONSE
From
DMG
To
GREYSTONE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />engineering work to be conducted for the fills. Therefore, this response is presently <br />inadequate. <br />104. Lorencito Coal Company revised page 2.05-59 in response to DMG's questions No. 104 <br />and 105. While Lorencito Coal Company's response was suitable, some formatting <br />problems ensued with page 2.05-59. Pazagraphs 1 and 2 were duplicated on page 2.05- <br />59. With elimination of the duplicated paragraphs, the Division will accept this revised <br />page. <br />107. Figure 2.04.4-20 was not included with the revised materials. <br />Rule 2.05.5 Post Minine Land Use <br />The response to question 109 is adequate. The application is in compliance with Rule 2.05.5. <br />Rule 2.05.6(1) Air Pollution Control Plan <br />I ] 0. The applicant's response is adequate. However, if the Division does not receive a copy <br />of an initially approved emission permit (or other equivalent form of permit) by the time <br />the mine application is ready for approval, the Division will have to stipulate receipt of <br />the emission permit prior to the operations beginning to which the emission permit <br />applies. <br />Rule 2.05.6(2) Fish and Wildlife Plan <br />Under this section, all responses were found adequate except as listed below. <br />111. Correspondence was received from John Woodling of the Division of Wildlife and Chris <br />Kloster of the Division of Wildlife. Based on our discussion on May 28, 1997, the DMG <br />will be reviewing this correspondence and will respond to LCC by June 5, 1997 with <br />regard to the various issues identified. <br />Rule 2.05.6(3) Protection of the Hydrologic Balance <br />The response to question 112 is adequate. The application is in compliance with Rule 2.05.6(3). <br />Rule 2.05.6(4) Protection of Public Parks and Historic Places <br />1 l3. See response under Rule 2.04.4 <br />Rule 2.05.6(5) Surface Mining near Underground Mining <br />114. The applicant has indicated this information will be submitted as soon as it is available. <br />Therefore, at this time, the response to this question remains inadequate. Also, on page <br />2.05-I 11 the term "mine plant" should be "mine plan". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.