My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11673
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11673
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:02 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:22:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981032
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Name
ROOF CONTROL DESIGN FOR 2ND EAST SECTION UNDER CURTIS CREEK VALLEY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GROUND CONTROL SYSTEM <br />• FOR RIENAU 112 MINE - 2nd EAST SECTION <br />The purpose of this study is to determine to what <br />extent, if any, disturbance will occur to the surface and <br />overlying strata as the 2nd East Section of Rienau 112 Mine <br />advances under Curtis Creek. <br />A conservative, or worse case, approach is taken <br />in that maximum pressures and minimum strengths are used in <br />the calculations. <br />The pillars under the area to be protected are 130 <br />feet by 60 feet solid coal on 150 feet by 80 feet centers. <br />This is 63% larger than the standard pillars used in the <br />Rienau 112 Mine. The mining heighth averages between 8 to <br />10 feet. <br />The width of the possible AVF (alluvial valley floor) <br />is estimated at 30 feet with Curtis Creek establishing the <br />approximate center line of the possible AVF. An additional <br />safety strip of 50 feet is added to each side of the possible <br />AVF. Therefore, the total width of surface to be protected is <br />130 feet. (Figure A) The lateral north-south width is not <br />• considered due to the virgin coal to the north and the barrier <br />pillar to the south which will be addressed later in this report. <br />Due to the protection of the solid coal to the North and South, <br />if subsidence were to occur, it would be in the center of the <br />2nd East Entry System. Therefore, the thickness of our burden <br />at the east-west edges of the protected surface area in the <br />center of the 2nd East Entries is used to calculate the angle <br />of draw width. This thickness is found to be 480 feet. <br />(Figure B) Using a conservative angle of draw of 30° the <br />width (W) of the draw area is calculated: <br />W = 480 ft. X tan 300 = 277 ft. <br />W = 280 ft. <br />Therefore, 280 feet are added to east-west sides of the pro- <br />tected surface area. Thus, the total width of the protected <br />area at the G seam elevation is = 280 ft. + 50 ft. + 30 ft. + <br />50 ft. + 280 ft. = 690 feet. <br />The maximum overburden to be supported within the <br />protected length is found to be on the east and west side of <br />the 690 feet length at points A and A~. (Figure B) This <br />depth is 550 feet. Using the standard of l.lpsi per foot of <br />overburdenl and correcting for difference in pillar area and <br />• <br />1SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Vol. 1, Pg. 13-37 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.