My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11549
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11549
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:54 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:21:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980002
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
10/29/1981
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~- -l1- <br />The proposed operation is in compliance with t.`.e reeuirements of .tiffs section. <br />XIX. Rules 7.05.3(3), 2.05.3(7) and 4.04 - `line Facilities, Coal '.'ardiinq <br />Structures, Support Facilities <br />Information on support facilities, •;oa1 handling structures and mine _'acil- <br />ities on page ZI and Exhibits 9 and 10 were checked for compliance. These <br />facilities and structures are discussed in this document under the section <br />on Oaerations Description. <br />No problems relative to these requirements were identified. The proposed <br />operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br />XX. Rules 7.05.3(3) and 4.03 - Roads <br />Information on roads can be _found on pace 12 and in Exhibit 9 of tie ^ermic <br />application. The Division reviewed this material for ccnpZiance. <br />access to the mine is. by county road. Cnly two small segments o.` road, each <br />less than 500 feet in :ength, were constructed by tie operator. Tiese roads <br />:feet all the requirements for grade, drainage, and surfacing of •7.03 fcr <br />access roads. <br />The proposed operation is in compliance witn recuirements of t..s section. <br />~ .XXI. Pule 1.05.4(2) (b) and .Rule 3 - °on~?~nc <br />1 <br />The reclamation cost estimate of 526,000 submitted by tie operator gas ac- <br />cepted by the Division. The cost breakdown is as follows: 1) 3uildi^? r_- <br />moval casts - 5.11,400; 7) Cost of sealing 2 portals - 5400: 3) 3ackfilli^:- <br />and grading costs - 59,200; 4) Topsoil replace;rent costs - 54,000; and 5) <br />Revegetation cost - 51,000. <br />2ursuant to Rule 2.07.5(2)(j) the Jiv-sion :i,^ds t`:at t:~e applicant :+'ii be <br />_'~ compliance with bondirc re?uirements. <br />The oropcsed operation is in ccmpliance with t.~e re~•virements o' t::is section. <br />{;{IZ. sul es 2.05.4(Z)(e) and 4.07 - Ecalino of Dri _'Icd lloles and /r.C Er^r7C.^.d <br />Opening5 <br />Tie applicant has done no drilling, tius no dril_' `oZes wi_'1 have to ce sealed. <br />The mechcd for sewing procals in Exhibit ? and ?ace SS :+as reviewed ~u t::e <br />Division for compliance. The sealirq ,-et.hod is to remove all ti:l:ers mad <br />concrete from the portals, then cave and ba ckfi 11 tie opening. :ha .sec^od <br />meets a1I appropriate reRu_'rements. <br />Tie proposed operation is in compliant= witn .ic .enu_r,.-eats of t.`._s sects... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.