My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11517
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:53 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:20:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/12/1981
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION KERR COAL CO MARR STRIP MARR PREP PLANT
From
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c ~ <br />The applicant predicts that the increase in salt leading would be a long- <br />term effect based upon studies at Trout Creek (p. 780-126hhhhh and <br />780-126iiiii). This does not seem likely given the differences between <br />the two minsites. At Trout Creek, the spoil aquifer discharges to Trout <br />Creek. This increased TDS in the spoil aquifer would provide a long- <br />term source for increased salt loadine in the stream. At the Kerr mine <br />site, the ephemeral draws crossing the permit area discharge to the <br />ground water system. Thus changes in ground water chemistry would not <br />effect surface water chemistry. <br />After pit dewatering ceases and the sediment ponds are removed, salt <br />_'oading should drop to natural levels. <br />3. Change in surface water ion balance <br />Data collected by the applicant indicates a change from a calcium- <br />bicarborate type baseline water to a sodium-bicarbonate and magnesium- <br />sulfate type affected water. These changes, along with the anticipated <br />salt loading, could cause the water quality to be somewhat less suitable <br />for stock water or irrigation. (780-126jjjjj) SAR values would be increased. <br />However, none of these charges including salt loadine would be significant <br />enough to affect surface water usage. Surface water quality would sti1Z <br />be well below recommended stock water standards for total disolved solids <br />(7000 mg/I). Affected surface waters, like the baseline waters, would <br />c_'assify as medium salinity, Zow alkali hazard irrigation waters. Based <br />upon studies at Trout Creek (p. 780-126hhhhh and 780-126iii) the applicant <br />has predicted that t::ese charees would be long-term. As discussed above, <br />hudrolocic conditions at the two minesites are different. At the Kerr <br />minesite, the ephemeral streams crossing the minesite discharge to the <br />bedrock around water system. Therefore, Zong-term changes in bed rock <br />ground water quality would not effect surface water duality in the ephemeral <br />streams. <br />Af.er ;pit dewatering ::as ceased, the pits have been backfilled, graded, <br />and topsoiled, and sediment ponds are removed, surface :cater chemistry <br />should return to baseline conditions. <br />TIPPLE SITE <br />Surface Plater <br />tJO effects on the quantity of surface flow have been identified. Runoff from the <br />permit area flows to a sediment pond before being released to the irrigation ditch <br />at the north boundary of the property. 19onitoring of pond effluent has not <br />identified any of the water duality effects described for the minesite (see Table ZO). <br />The applicant maintains that coal dust blown into the marsh has not affected <br />water quality. The water quality data provided in Table 10 neither supports or <br />dissapprores thisc~nclusion. Additional investigations should be undertaken. <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.