My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11504
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:53 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:20:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/18/1981
Doc Name
REVIEW OF APPENDICES N O P & Q OF THE HAYDEN GULCH COAL MINE PERMANENT PERMIT APPLICATION DEALING WI
From
MLR
To
BRIAN MUNSON
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Brian Munson <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />- - -- - -~ <br />~II ~I~~IIII~~~~~ ~II <br />999 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />RE: Review of <br />Permanent <br />STATE OF COLORA00 RICHARD D. •ll. Dovc~m~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURC ES <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Executive Director <br />423 Centennial Builtling, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 60203 Tel. (303) 839-3567 <br />A~, O, P and Q of the Hayden Gulch Coal Mine <br />ication, Dealing with Various Geotechnical Topics <br />Pursuant to your request I have reviewed appendices N, 0, P and Q of the Nayden <br />Gulch Coal Mine application. I forward the following comments for your <br />consideration. <br />Appendices N, O and P <br />Appendices N, O and P, prepared by Chen & Associates, each deal with <br />foundational investigation and engineering design of various ancillary facilities <br />for the Hayden Gulch Coal Mine. (underground fuel storage tanks, building <br />foundations, railroad spur, loadout building foundations, haul road pavement <br />section design, etc.) <br />In each case Chen ~ Associates appears to have conformed with prudent state-of- <br />the-art of geotechnical and engineering practices. Assuming the construction <br />of the facilities conforms with the consultant's recommendations, 2 would not <br />anticipate any performance problems with theserfacilities. <br />Appendix Q <br />Appendix Q presents the results of the geotechnical investigations, design <br />parameters, stability analyses, construction guidelines and monitoring <br />recommendations for each of the proposed five sediment control reservoirs. In <br />the words of the consultants: "She proposed earth fill embankments will range <br />in configuration from a crest height of 22 to 54 feet and side slope of 2.5 to <br />3 horizontal to 1 vertical and have maximum impoundment of approximately 5 to <br />39 acre-feet." As such all of the proposed embankments classify as "sedimentation <br />control reservoirs", in accordance with Rule 4.05.6(10). <br />The consultant's report contains thorough geotechnical investigations, including <br />materials testing results of the sub-soils and bedrock, of each of the various <br />reservoir sites. The report observes that care in design and, construction is <br />necessary on this site because of the moderately steep foundational slopes and <br />the high degree of saturation of many of the foundational sub-soils. Particular <br />concern is focused upon pond bl and its embankment. <br />(cont'd) <br />March 18, 1981 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.