My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11496
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11496
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:53 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:20:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/5/1997
Doc Name
LORENCITO CANYON MINE PN C-96-084 NEW PERMIT APPLICATION DIVISION OF WILDLIFE ISSUES AND RESPONSES
From
DMG
To
GREYSTONE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />The DOW requests that the applicant conduct water quality monitoring on a monthly basis <br />at the upstream and downstream sites of the Purgatoire as well as at the mouth of <br />Lorencito Canyon. The applicant has modified the monitoring plan to conduct monthly <br />flow and field monitoring and quarterly water quality sampling at these sites. The <br />Division considers this response adequate. <br />Lack of topsoil <br />The applicant predicts that due to steep slopes and azeas of bedrock exposure, a deficit of topsoil <br />will exist at the conclusion of surface mining. The DOW requests that the applicant import <br />topsoil to the site to address this shortage. <br />The Division would like the applicant to further investigate topsoil replacement options. The <br />Division is concerned that valuable topsoil is proposed not to be salvaged in certain areas. <br />Topsoil is defined by Rule 4.06.2(2)(b) as soil horizons on the surface prior to mining that will <br />support plant life. The reclamation plan calls for .7 feet of topsoil to be distributed over 901 <br />acres of the surface mine. However, the Division is confused by permit text on page 2.05-35 <br />which states "reapplication may be limited to south-facing slopes where revegetation conditions <br />will be more difficult". If .7 feet is to be re-applied over 901 acres, why does the permit text <br />indicate approximately 1/2 of the surface mine area will be reclaimed without topsoil? <br />Information needs to be consistent between what is represented in the various tables and <br />calculations and what is in the permit text. <br />If topsoil will not be re-applied in certain areas, these areas need to be indicated on a map. <br />Topsoil re-application depths for all other areas should also be clearly represented. The Division <br />will not approve a plan that is "field controlled" by subjective estimates and daily site conditions. <br />With the exception of bedrock outcrops and an occasional extreme slope, it is the Division's <br />observation that topsoil, as defined, exists over the vast majority of the surface mine area. <br />The Division does not agree with the applicant that slopes of 30-35% aze too steep for topsoil <br />salvage. Conversation with equipment manufacturers indicates that topsoil can be easily removed <br />on slopes of 50% and greater, if necessary, using proper care and safety procedures. Equipment <br />manuals also give recommendations for increasing fluid levels for equipment operation on slopes <br />of 100% (1:1). <br />The Division concurs with the DOW concern related to topsoil salvage and re-application and this <br />issue remains inadequate at this time. <br />Shrub reveeetation plan <br />The DOW has recommended that the current land-use ofrangeland/wildlife habitat be maintained <br />on the surface mine. The Division believes this objective can be accomplished while also <br />accommodating the landowners desire to reclaim the area to improve cattle grazing conditions. <br />One way to satisfy both parties is to conduct shrub re-establishment efforts in concentrated areas <br />while leaving other areas of open grassland. This not only reduces grass competition but <br />increases edge, improves vertical diversity, allows for development of micro-habitats, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.