My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11496
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11496
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:53 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:20:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/5/1997
Doc Name
LORENCITO CANYON MINE PN C-96-084 NEW PERMIT APPLICATION DIVISION OF WILDLIFE ISSUES AND RESPONSES
From
DMG
To
GREYSTONE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii • • <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 866-3567 <br />FA%:13031 832-8106 <br />June 5, 1997 <br />Greystone Development Consultants, Inc. <br />5990 Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Ste. 250 <br />Englewood, CO 80111 <br />Attn: Jerry Koblitz <br />RE: Lorencito Canyou Mine (Permit No. C-96-084) ~ <br />New Permit Application <br />Division of Wildlife Issues and Responses <br />Dear Jerry: <br />~I~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCE <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. Lochhead <br />Executive Director <br />Michael B. Long <br />Drvivon Dneuor <br />Recently, the Division of Minerals and Geology (Division) completed review of [he responses of <br />our initial adequacy review and forwarded them to you for the Lorencito Canyon Mine permit <br />application. Specifically excluded from this correspondence was a detailed Division concerning <br />those issues identified by the Division of Wildlife (DOW). The Division has completed review <br />of these issues and would like to summarize and focus any remaining concerns remaining with <br />regard to wildlife and related issues. From my discussions with Chris Kloster of the DOW, they <br />will not be in a position to formally respond to LCC's first responses until sometime later this <br />month. His verbal indications is that, excluding the shrub establishment issue, LCC's first <br />responses seemed reasonable, except for the lack of population sampling of the Flathead chub. <br />Due to the pending July 2, 1997 decision date, it is important that those other remaining issues <br />be identified for your consideration. <br />In our letter of May 27, 1997, our response to Rule 2.05.6(2) and Rule 4.18 was as follows: <br />Rule 2.05.6(2) Fish and Wildlife Plan <br />Under this section, all responses were found adequate except as listed below. <br />] 11. Correspondence was received from John Woodling of the Division of Wildlife and <br />Chris Kloster of the Division of Wildlife. Based on our discussion on May 28, <br />1997, the DMG will be reviewing this correspondence and will respond to LCC <br />by June 5, 1997 with regard to the various issues identified. <br />Rule 4.18 Protection of Fish. Wildlife and Related Environmental Values <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.