My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11433
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11433
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:43 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:20:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/11/1980
Doc Name
MLRB REVIEW JOB 5844
From
CTL THOMPSON INC
To
ENERGY FUELS CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- T _ <br />.-_:. C~~,~ ~ ~~~ III III IIII <br />• CTL/THOMPSON, INC. <br />CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS <br />January 11, 1980 <br />Energy Fuels Corporation <br />Box G <br />Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477 <br />Attention: Mr. John Gates <br />Subject: MLRB Review <br />Job No. 5844 <br />Gentlemen: <br />The purpose of this letter is to provide Energy fuels additional informa- <br />tion and data for answers to various questions raised during the review <br />by MLRB and OSM of our report for design of excess spoil disposal areas <br />in the proposed Eckman Park Mine. To facilitate all concerned, our reply <br />references each memo by author, date, and item. <br />• Memo, Rick Mills <br />December 20, 1979 <br />Page -4- <br />Item 3) the question is regarding the drainage system on tap of the <br />excess spoil structures. In our opinion, there has been a semantics problem <br />with regard to drainage on top of the excess spoil structures. Our intent <br />was covered by recommendation 11 in our report of September 11, 1979. Es- <br />sentially, we recommend that the point of intersection of the outslope with <br />the top of the fill be the highest portion of the excess spoil pile. We <br />further recommended that the central portion of the fill be overbuilt ap- <br />proximately 5 percent to allow for long-term settlement. This will result <br />in water draining from the surface of the fill and flowing to the edge of <br />the fill. At various locations within our report, for example, recommenda- <br />tion 9, we have suggested surface drainage ditches on both sides of the pro- <br />posed fill, and additionally, we have recommended an interceptor ditch near <br />the point of intersection of the natural soils with the top of the disposal <br />fill. We assume that moisture which collects on the surface of the disposal <br />area will be directed to collection ditches located along the side and at <br />the top of the fill. I am afraid there may have been some misunderstanding <br />in the verbage. In our report, we have referred to point of intersection <br />of the outslope with the top of the fill as the head of the fill. I believe <br />the type of drainage we are anticipating would be in conformance with para- <br />graph 816.72-f. As the side drainages are directed down the valley, some <br />riprap will be necessary. This can probably be developed by selectively <br />C~ <br />1701 SOUTH FEDERAL BLVD. SUITED DENVER, COLORADO 80219 (303) 9345473 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.