My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11385
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:42 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:19:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Name
BASELINE OVERBURDEN ASSESSMENT PLAN YOAST STUDY AREA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agp L ~ potential acidity exceeds the neutralization potential <br />The list includes all Phase I <br />parameters which had values that exceeded unsuitable levels or had maximum concentration <br />greater than 50 percent of the threshold value. Total combustible solids, an indicator of <br />.... the fire hazard potential, wilt not be analyzed on Phase II samples since carbonaceous <br />.- overburden materials, other than the Lennox coal seam, are not present at Yoast. No <br />-. mercury or arsenic analyses are warranted at Yoast due to the extremely remote chances of <br />any potential mercury or arsenic toxicity. There have been no documented cases of arsenic <br />or mercury toxicity to plants or to animals under normal conditions (Munshower, 1983). <br />Mercury and arsenic toxicity is limited to industrial or agricultural situations where <br />mercuric or arsenic fungicides or other contaminants are used (Barrett et al., 1980). <br />- Nitrate analyses will be completed on the Phase II samples because elevated levels have <br />been previously reported i erbu den-samf~les_ m the Seneca II and II-W mine areas. <br />Manganese and lead ana.lyse~ecortmlende~d-~o confirm or deny the drill stem <br />• ~ contamination hypothesis. <br />Laboratory Methods <br />/ 1 / ~ J. <br />The analysis list for the four Phase II salmple s tes wi 11 include pH, EC, saturation <br />percent, scid base potential, iron, manganese, ni rate, and particle size. Sulfur I <br />fractionation (i.e., pyritic, sulfate, and organic) analyses will only be performed when <br />The parameter/procedure list to be used for the Phasel~' T samples collected from the Yoast <br />study area is listed in Table 2. <br />Cited Literature <br />~- ~ American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM). 1980. Gaseous Fuels - Coal and Coke - <br />Atmospheric Analysis. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 26. <br /> <br />Barrett, J., P. C. Deutsch, F.G. Ethridge, W.T. Franklin, R.D. Heil, D.B. McWhorter, and <br />A,D. Youngberg. 1980. Procedures Recommended for Overburden and Hydrologic Studies <br />of Surface Mines. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-71, <br />InterMountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah. 106 p. <br />Barth, R.C., L.G. Cox, A. Ciard inelli, S.M. Sutton, Jr., and L. C. Tisdel. 1981. State of <br />the Art and Guidelines for Surface Coal Mine Overburden Sampling and Analysis, Phase <br />I Report: Survey of Current Methods and Procedures. Submitted to USDI-OSMRE on C/N <br />J5101047 by Colorado School of Mines Research Institute, Golden. 169 p. <br />5~'~`` <br />..,b `Q, <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.