My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11385
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:42 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:19:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Name
BASELINE OVERBURDEN ASSESSMENT PLAN YOAST STUDY AREA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
overburden holes to proof de a more uniform density of sample sites across the Wedge coal <br />recovery area, sample thicknesses of overburden (40, 50, 60 and 110 feet) not included in <br />the earlier Phase I sampling, test for constituents not included on the Phase I parameter <br />list, and confirm the extents of unsuitable constituents identified by the Phase I <br />drilling program. The Lennox coal seam will be sampled at the thickest overburden site. <br />. The combined Phase I and Phase II sampling~iTntensity will be 1 hole/40 acres. <br />W ~" a* ~ 5 P ~u ,U- C~at~, S gµ~~i v-q /x'fCh S ~ 7 <br />. .. Sample Contamf nation <br />Numerous overburden sample contamination problems have been documented over the last ten <br />years in the western United States. Drilling fluids, foam additivesi and muds can <br />appreciably affect the soluble constituents (especially EC, SAR, and NH4) in the sample. <br />During rotary drilling for cores or cuttings, it is necessary to use a drilling medium <br />such as air, water, or mud for lifting cuttings from the borehole. For overburden <br />baseline studies, it is recononended that air be used whenever possible, water second, and <br />~~ mud or foam avoided unless absolutely necessary to overcome circulation problems or to <br />~. lift cuttings from deep holes (Barrett et al., 1980; Power and Sandoval, 1976•,' Dollhopf et <br />al., 1981; and Peabody Coal Company, 1987). A chemical analysis should be obtained on the <br />_, water, foam, and/or drilling mud whenever they are utilized. <br />Random sample contamination often results in serious misinterpretations of the data. Many <br />previously reported unsuitable copper, molybdenum, zinc, and especially lead <br />concentrations were more apt to have been caused by drill stem grease contamination than <br />natural mineralized strata. Dollhopf and Goering (1983), Dollhopf et al. (1981), Peabody <br />Coal Company (1988), antl Rochelle Coal Company (1984) all demonstrated that significant <br />contamination resulted from zinc, copper, molybdenum, and lead based dri li stem joint <br />lubricants. A noncontaminating drill stem joint lubricant should be utilized when copper, <br />lead, zinc, molybdenum, or other metals are included on the baseline parameter list. <br /> <br />Peabody suspects the excessive iron and manganese values present in the Phase I Yoast <br />samples can be attributed to the core samples having been contaminated by drill stem <br />grease. Elevated values of iron and manganese appear systematically about every ten feet <br />in each core section. This correlates closely with the frequency that each core barrel <br />would have been emptied and regressed. <br />Peabody will use a noncontaminating drill stem joint lubricant (aluminum or lithium based) <br />on all of the Yoast Phase II sample sites. The four holes will be drilled exclusively <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.