Laserfiche WebLink
_ ~ ~. • • <br />-3- <br />This concern has been adequately addressed in the November 10 <br />1 submittal. This issue <br />1 is considered resolved. <br />1 <br />In Summary: <br />1. The Division is satisfied with the November 10 <br /> vegetation map. however the permittee should <br /> label each commu nity on the map. <br />2. The Division is not satisfied with the 1982 <br />~ sampling of the vegetative communities for cover <br /> and production. <br />3. The Division cannot detecmine if the woody plant <br /> density data is adequate. <br />4. Refe[ence areas will not be required. <br />j 5. The expanded qua litative discussion of each <br />vegetation community is sufficient. <br />At this point the permitte has not submitted Snformation on <br />StLpulation No. 9 to their permit, and is technically in <br />violation. <br />/ys <br />