My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11336
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11336
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:40 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:19:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/17/1981
Doc Name
PINNACLE TRACT LEASE SALE PROPOSED LEASE FORM
From
ENERGY FUELS CORP
To
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
n ~ <br />Mr. Gerald Magnuson <br />~~- April 15, 1981 <br />-~~ Page 4 <br />y.i ~:. <br />(i) increasing the quantity and quality of <br />forage available to wildlife. <br />(ii) The acquisition of critical wildlife <br />habitats. <br />(iii) Mechanical manipulation of low quality <br />wildlife habitat to increase its carrying <br />capacity for selected wildlife species. <br />(iv) Recovery, replacement or protection of <br />important wildlife habitat by selected <br />fencing. <br />(3) A timetable giving the periods of time which <br />will be required to accomplish the habitat recovery <br />or replacement plan and showing how this timetable <br />relates to the overall mining plan. <br />(4) An evaluation of the final plan by the Colorado <br />Division of Wildlife. The state shall comment on <br />the methods selected and the techniques to be <br />employed by the lessee and may recommend alternate <br />recovery or replacement methods. If the state has <br />recommended an alternate method, the lessee shall <br />consider the state's recommendation and, if the <br />lessee rejects the state's plan, the lessee shall <br />indicate its reasons as required by provision 2 <br />above. If no state comment is included in the plan, <br />the lessee shall verify its consultation with the <br />state and the plan may be considered without state <br />comment." <br />OBJECTION: The requirement that the prospective lessee submit <br />a detailed habitat recovery and replacement plan to the BLM <br />and DOW for approval is inappropriate as a special stipulation <br />in a federal coal lease. These provisions should be deleted <br />in their entirety. Any requirement that the prospective <br />lessee submit a habitat recovery and replacement plan should <br />be imposed by OSD1 and MLRB as part of the mine plan approval <br />process, after the wildlife values and concerns have been <br />carefully evaluated, based upon current and reliable data. <br />The BLM should not, through lease provisions, usurp the <br />function of OSM and ML_°.B. Nor should the BLM imbue the DOW <br />with disproportionate authority to impose special wildlife <br />mitigation requirements on a prospective lessee, over the <br />authority of the DSLRB, the agency authorized under Colorado <br />law to approve or disapprove mine plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.