My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11336
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11336
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:40 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:19:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/17/1981
Doc Name
PINNACLE TRACT LEASE SALE PROPOSED LEASE FORM
From
ENERGY FUELS CORP
To
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />tdr. Gerald Magnuson <br />~" April 15, 1981 <br />. ~~: ~:. <br />~::.~ Page P. <br />,":u <br />~,-- <br /> <br />concerned that this contractual provision limits the rights of <br />the prospective lessee pursuant to 43 C.F.R. Section 3473.3- <br />2(d). The rights of a prospective lessee to seek royalty rate <br />reductions pursuant to 43 C.F.R. Section 3473.3-2(d) should <br />not be infringed through contractual provisions. To avoid the <br />inherent ambiguity between the lease provision and the rights <br />under 43 C.F.R. Section 3473.3-2(d), the above quoted <br />provision should be deleted. <br />Lease Provision - Section 31. SPECIAL STIPULATIONS: <br />"(a) All stipulations concerning compliance with <br />the requirements of the Surface Mining Control and <br />Reclamation Act will be included in the document <br />approving the mining plan." <br />OBJECTION: This provision is inconsistent with the internal <br />policy of the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and <br />Enforcement ("OSM") to avoid, if possible, stipulations in <br />mine plan approvals, tioreover, Energy Fuels believes that it <br />is inappropriate for the BLM to require that the prospective <br />lessee assure that all stipulations concerning compliance with <br />the Surface brining Control and Reclamation Act ("S~iCRA" ) be <br />included in the documents approving the minx plan. A decision <br />to include specific stipulations in the document approving the <br />mine plan should be made by OStQ and the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board ("MLRH"), not by the BLM in the form of a <br />lease stipulation. <br />"(b) The lessee shall be required to mitigate for <br />mule deer, elk, antelope, and sage grouse habitat <br />loss where applicable and the resultant loss or <br />displacement of these species, as key indicator <br />species, due to surface coal mining operations. <br />Concurrently with the filing of its mine plan, the <br />lessee shall submit for approval to the Bureau of <br />Land Management (BLtd), a habitat recovery and <br />replacement plan for protection or enhancement of <br />mule deer, elk, antelope, and sage grouse popula- <br />tions affected by habitat loss or displacement from <br />historic habitat. <br />The habitat recovery and replacement plan shall be <br />developed in consultation with the BLM and the <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife based on estimates of <br />lost and disturbed habitat as described in the Green <br />River-Hams Fork Coal final Environmental Impact <br />Statement (EIS). If the mine plan submitted by the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.