Laserfiche WebLink
ti <br />STATE OF COLORADO qiC VlAgp D. ~. Gov c.~o~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (30~) 839-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />April 15, 1981 Director <br />T0: Jim Herron <br />FROM: Richard A. Domingue ~, ~,~,n.w.~~~ <br />SUBJECT: GEX Roadside and Cameo Mine - Sediment Control System <br />Our File No. C-041-81 <br />Rule 4.05.3 Diversions and Conveyances of Overland Flow: <br />iii iuiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />1. Peak Flows Estimates: GEX has used the SCS method described in the manual <br />Peak Flows in Colorado to estimate peak flows. None of the estimates appear <br />to have considered basin shape corrections as described in appendix E of the <br />manual. Estimates using the Homographs should also include slope corrections <br />where the slope is not exactly as stated on the graphs. GEX must: <br />a. Show all information necessary to generate the CN's used. <br />I. Hydrologic Soil Group, <br />II. Land Use, or <br />III. Cover type and density. <br />b. Provide an estimate of average watershed slope. <br />c. Provide basin shape and slope corrections where applicable. <br />2. Design Velocities: In several cases, specifically in cast-over ditch <br />designs the channel geometry is not sufficiently defined to determine area <br />(A) and wetted perimeter (P). These parameters should be shown as functions <br />of depth (d) in order to determine design depth, velocity, and freeboard. <br />(See Barfield and Haan (1978) page 130-131. Several of the ditches had erosive <br />velocities at design flows. GEX must: <br />a. Provide sufficient dimensional detail to completely define the channels, <br />b. Show area (A) and wetted perimeter (P) in terms of depths (d), <br />c. Provide estimates of velocity at design flows, <br />d. Provide information on channel lining necessary to prevent erosion at <br />design velocities (4.05.3(6)(a)), and <br />e. Show that 0.3 ft. freeboard will exist under design flows (4.05.3(6)(b)). <br />