My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11322
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11322
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:40 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:19:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/1/1990
Doc Name
AREA 61 POSTMINING TOPOGRAPHY C-81-071
From
MLRD
To
COLO YAMPA COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ STAT~OF (III ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />RA x: 303 632-8106 <br />OF'~~fp <br />ti~~ 'P> <br />~~ ~- (~7J I~iB <br />~ /876 ~ <br />Roy Romer, <br />Governor <br />August 1 , 1990 Rreo R. Banta. <br />Drv~sion Direotor <br />Mr. Rick Mills <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Company <br />29587 Routt County Road No. 27 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado 80467 <br />RE: Area 61 - Postmining Topography - C-81-071 <br />Dear Mr. Mills: <br />We have reviewed the postmining topography information dated July 20, 1990 <br />(received July 24, 1990). Three cross-sections were provided. Cross-sections <br />61(8-R) and 61(E-R) indicate that the postmining configuration closely <br />resembles the previously approves configuration. <br />Cross-section 61(C-R) indicates a bit more variation, We understand that the <br />increased relief is due to the elevated coal bed which resulted from fault <br />displacement in Area 61. The steepest section of cross-section 61(C-R) is <br />about 14% (7H:1V), and although this is steeper than was anticipated, the <br />slope should not present any unusual reclamation problems. For these reasons <br />the configuration will be acceptable. <br />The Area 61 cross-sections 61(B-R), 61(E-R) and 61(C-R) indicate topography <br />which is acceptable. You may proceed with topsoil reaistribution when time <br />permits. <br />Thank you for the submittal. <br />Sincere.ly~ ~' <br />-, <br />~~ <br />- :~ <br />.'/L David ~ y <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />DAB/scg <br />cc: J. Stevens <br />9134E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.