My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11272
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11272
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:38 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:19:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
12/19/1980
Doc Name
REVIEW OF TBM SEDIMENT CONTROL
From
MLR
To
MIKE SAVAGE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 <br />Mike Savage <br />December 19, 1980 <br />the use of 0.90 to 1.00 for areas mined and regraded. Your alternative is <br />to assume worst case conditions using a C factor in the range quoted above, <br />or submit a mining sequence table which incorporates and averages C valves <br />over a one year period of mining. The latter procedure is outlined in <br />"Hydrology and Sedimentology of Surface Mined Lands" by Barfield and Naan. <br />In response to your request of a one year sediment storage volume <br />approval, I have discussed the issue with Carol Pahlke and Jerry Zimpfer of <br />our staff. We will allow approval of a 1 year storage only if TBM can <br />demonstrate that a 20 year 24 hour storm will result in a sediment volume <br />that is less than 50% of your design sediment storage volume. You would <br />have to submit calculations of sediment yield from a 10 year 24 hour <br />storm. Your alternative to this would be to design all ponds with a 2 year <br />sediment storage volume. <br />q9. TBM must indicate that topsoil will be stripped from all areas to be <br />disturbed during pond construction including areas under and adjacent to the <br />embankment as well as the area under the 100 sediment storage of the pond. <br />~t10. Carol Pahlke has indicated to me that a collection ditch is located <br />along the county road below the coal stockpile area. If this ditch is used <br />to collect water from a portion of the disturbed area into pond 15-PI then <br />the designs and location on a map must be submitted. <br />N12. Culvert C4 is under a haul road and must comply with Section 715.17(1) <br />(2)(iii). It makes no difference who installed the culvert. Also culvert C-6 <br />is vital to your sediment control system. If this culvert is not designed <br />to handle a 10 year event, then water will back up and flow into your collection <br />ditch to pond 25-P1. The culvert design must be submitted to check capacity <br />or we will require Pond 15-P1 to be designed to handle runoff from undisturbed <br />areas. <br />I have some additional comments that pertain to sediment control structures <br />and culverts that have at present not been addressed. <br />Culvert Designs <br />A complete review of culverts throughout the mine area is not possible until <br />additional information is submitted. Information for all culverts must include: <br />a. whether the pipe is helical, annular, no corrugations, etc.; <br />b. the type of pipe used (i.e. CMP, concrete, structural plate, etc.); <br />c. whether the culverts are projecting, mitered, inlet controlled or <br />outlet control; <br />d. the design headwater; <br />e. whether rock, cement, or metal headwalls will be used; <br />f. the length of the culvert and the tailwater depth if the culvert is <br />outlet controlled; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.