My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11230
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11230
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:37 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:18:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Name
EMPIRE ENERGY CORP PERMIT APPLICATION FN C-044-81
From
MLRD
To
EMPIRE ENERGY CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~:i~~ ;~rlls -~- hprii u, 1J3.; <br />•,ritli,di CGnCerllS hdve :15G bL'eii 1Ce nt 71-~~ed 111 the legal, •.Jl ldl lfe and <br />oon.~iny sections of the p~nnit applicat~~,n. These also must be <br />aueyuatuly •~rJdressed before we can make the required tindinys for those <br />sections. Thz legal concerns pertain to the outdated information in the <br />aa.ended application. The wildlife concerns ~•,ere raises] oecause o` <br />changes in the a:nendeo application from the original application. The <br />uonuiny section was never reviewed by the Division because Empire energy <br />Corporation requested to wait until the end of the review process when <br />all other issues fend been resolved. Sine a permit cannot be issued <br />until a' uund is uus:qu•iLe in Furui .ind a~no~rnL, Lhe bonuiny question must ue <br />resolved at this time. <br />The remaining items that need to be answered to bring the application <br />into full compliance could he sLipulaLud as conditions Co the ps:r•~uiC 'in a <br />Ilnuinys uocu~ucnL. Ihu;u .ire IisLuu and^r Lhe suLlru•iulny LiLl~d <br />"SCipulations" in each section of the attached review docu~uent. The <br />stipulations are direr.ted at; 1) items that have been arJdressed during <br />the revieel process but h,lve not been iucorpurated into Coe ansend%d <br />application; 2) infernal inconsistencies; and S) adequacy questions for <br />those sections where a new plan has been presented. <br />hFter you have hart an opportunity Co revfew Lhe attacheu uucwoent, I <br />recomrnend that we set up a meeting to estaolish the tune frames for <br />completion of the review and to have our respective technical staffs meet <br />to aiscuss the technical details. Please feel free to contact Fred Banta <br />or Sanura Emrich if you have any questions on the content of the attached <br />revievr document or need assistance. I will continue to be involved very <br />closely with these issues until their final resolution. i look forward <br />to a cwtually satisfactory conclusion to this permitting process. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Davin C. Shelton <br />Director <br />ucs7eap <br />cc: Pnil Idolf <br />bob Purswell <br />Fred Banta <br />Ed Bischoff <br />Sanura Emricn <br />Floyd Johnson <br />Uoc. ~~o. 2027 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.