Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ~, <br />-3- <br />A chronology of events related to [his MRP application can be found in Attach- <br />ment B. The U.S, Geological Survey provided written concurrence with the pro- <br />posed action on August 20, 1981. The Bureau of Land Management provided writ- <br />ten concurrence on September 16, 1981. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was <br />consulted regarding threatened and endangered species and concurred on Septem- <br />ber 29, 1981 with the preferred alternative. The State Historic Preservation <br />Officer concurred with OSM's proposed compliance with 36 CFR part 800 on Octo- <br />ber 2, 1981. The State regulatory authority has provided a formal recommenda- <br />tion for approval on November 3, 1981. A copy of each letter of concurrence <br />in our files is attached (Attachment C). <br />My recommendation is based on the TA and EA on file in the OSM mine plan file <br />in the Western Technical Service Center and at the headquarters Administrative <br />Record. As attested to in that document, I have determined that this action <br />will not have a significant impact on the human environment. <br />The information in the mining and reclamation plan for the Orchard Valley <br />mine, as well as the other information documented in the TA and EA and avail- <br />able to the public has been reviewed by the OSM staff under the direction of <br />the Technical Project Officer. Based on that review and the State's finding, <br />I recommend that you find that CWI's proposed mining plan for their Orchard <br />.~ <br />_ Valley Mine is in compliance with applicable rules and statul•es (786.19). <br />Attachment D contains the specifics of this finding. <br />Attachments: A. Maps--A,B,C <br />B. Chronology <br />C. Concurrence letters <br />D. Findings _ <br />..~ <br />