My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11209
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:36 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:18:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/17/1983
Doc Name
CYCCS RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY REVIEW FOIDEL CREEK MINE
From
MLRD
To
SANDY EMRICH & ED BISCHOFF
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t • • <br />-z- <br />VII. Protection of the Hvarolouic Balance <br />1) This item made two requests of the applicant, that the <br />discussion of probable hydrologic consequences be quantified, <br />and that analysis be provided for specific additional concerns <br />(items 2-5). The applicant has responded by providing a <br />quantitative analysis of chose items specifically requested. <br />The applicant has not quantified those surface water effects <br />identified in the oriyinal discussion of probable hydroloyic <br />consequences. For some of those surface water effects, <br />quantification nay not be possible or appropriate. However, <br />given the Division's concerns about salt loadiny in the area, <br />the increase in total dissolved solids in runoff from the permit <br />area (p. 2.05-55), and its effect upon receiving streams needs <br />to be quantified. (This applies to sources other than the <br />discharye of mine water from underground workinys.) <br />4uantification of this effect should be possible using the <br />results of the applicants surface water and NPDES monitoriny. <br />(sandy, you should check with koy to see if he is satisfied with <br />the quantification of ground water effects.) <br />2) Item two made several requests concerniny the effect of the <br />discharye of water from underyround workings to the Foidel Creek <br />stream/alluvial aquifer system. The applicant was requested to <br />provide a worst case estimate of the quantity and quality of <br />this discharge. The applicant has identified a worst case <br />discharge of 650 ypni having a total dissolved solids <br />concentration of 800 any/1. Altriouyh total dissolved solids is <br />an important indicator of overall water quality, it does not, by <br />itself, fully describe the quality of the discharge. The <br />applicant should provide a full suite chemistry of the <br />anticipated discharge. This could be obtained from the <br />discharye records of nearby underground mines. The applicant <br />should also provide documentation for the selection of a maximum <br />anticipated total dissolved solids concentration of 800 mg/l. <br />The worst case discharge of 65U gpm (936,000 ypd) used for the <br />analysis is considerably less than the projected mine inflow of <br />[,335,000 gpd projected for the fourth year of operation. The <br />analysis of the effects of discharge mine water and water from <br />the spoil well to the surface water system should be redone <br />using worst case water quantity and quality. Although the <br />analysis nay be limited to total dissolved solids, as requested <br />above, the applicant should identify the anticipated full suite <br />chemistry of the spoil water and of the mine water. <br />The applicant was requested to predict the effects of mine water <br />discharge (from the mine workings and the spoil well) upon <br />surface flow regie~ne, geomorphic stability of the stream, <br />alluvial water levels, and alluvial water quality. The <br />applicant did not address these concerns, but should do so now. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.