My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11061
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:32 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:17:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981026
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
9/14/1981
From
WYOMING FUEL CO
To
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />available for storage. The scenario does, however, depict in an <br />average year what the total intra-basin water amounts attributable <br />to snowmelt are. This water is, however, not necessarily available <br />water for storage or irrigation purposes. <br />The amount of truely available water attributable to <br />snowmelt would be very difficult to quantify because it would depend <br />on ground infiltration rates, evapotranspiration rates, the rate at <br />which the snow melted and the length of time taken for the ground to <br />become saturated enough to promote direct runoff. Therefore, the <br />statement that was made by the authority referring to the calculated <br />yield being much greater than the actual volume is correct. This <br />leads us to the belief that water availability within the Bolton Draw <br />watershed itself does not occur in reliable or great enough quantities <br />to be depended upon for use in irrigation. This is undoubtedly the <br />reason why past irrigation attempts in Bolton Draw used water from <br />the trans-basin Spear Ditch, a more reliable source. <br />The applicable water yield from the North Fork of Bolton <br />Draw has already been quantified in terms of mining impact to the <br />surface flow potentially available to the downstream reaches of Main <br />Bolton Draw. The authority is directed to Section 2.05.6(3)(b)(iv) <br />Page 92 which states that "...2.70 of the potential surface water <br />flow to the Bolton Draw drainage will be reduced by sediment pond <br />detention from the Canadian Strip Mine". <br />3) Wyoming Fuel Company has never doubted the existence of <br />potentially subirrigated regions within the downstream reaches of <br />Main Bolton Draw. We will accept the configuration of this potentially <br />subirrigated area as indicated by the referenced Marr Strip Mining <br />and Reclamation Plan Technical and Environmental Analysis and the <br />Technical Analysis of the Canadian Strip Mine. To spend time <br />reevaluating this area is a needless duplication of effort. <br />Wyoming Fuel Company has made a concerted effort to <br />demonstrate that continuation of the Canadian Strip Mine around <br />the nose of the anticline will have no appreciable effects on the <br />hydrologic regime in the North Fork of Bolton Draw or in the down- <br />stream reaches of Main Bolton Draw. This detailed analysis is <br />presented in Section 2.05.6(3)(b)(iv) Pages 92-99 under Prediction <br />of Probable Hydrologic Consequences. <br />TOPSOIL <br />2.05.4(2)(e)(vii) <br />The soil testing program will include analysis of those para- <br />meters listed in Attachment 3 of Addendum I of July 28, 1981 sub- <br />mitted by Wyoming Fuel Company. Approximately three (3) soil <br />samples will be taken on an annual basis prior to fall seeding. <br />Three samples is an approximation. As the size of the reclaimed <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.