My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10950
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10950
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:29 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:16:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981020
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/3/1981
Doc Name
REVIEW OF SUBSIDENCE AND UNDERGROUND DEVELOPMENT WASTE GEOTECHNICAL SECTIONS OF MUNGER MINE PLAN
From
MLR
To
BRIAN MUNSON
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Brian Munson -2- March 3, 1981 <br />toe buttress be installed to help stabilize any fill on a slope which exceeds <br />1 vertical to 2.8 horizontal (36~). <br />No geotechnical analysis is presented in the application. Rule 2.05.3(6)(c) re- <br />quires the inclusion of a geotechnical analysis including a stability analysis <br />of the proposed underground development waste pile in the permit application. <br />The statement included on page 2-31 of the application that; "when fill is <br />spread in 2-thick foot lifts, the resulting compaction will be adequate to <br />provide and maintain a safe and stable slope at 1 vertical: 3 horizontal", is <br />not adequate to satisfy the requirements of the permanent regulatory program. <br />Jerry Zimpfer should review and comment on the adequacy of the diversion channel, <br />interceptor channel and sedimentation pond sections of this application. <br />The geotechnical analysis of the proposed fill should include a thoroughauger or <br />boring investigation of the foundational area designed to determine bedrock, soil <br />and hydrogeological conditions encountered. The report should also include <br />geologic profiles, material testing and description of materials encountered, and <br />a mathematicalstability analysis of the slope static safety factors of the fill <br />proposed to be constructed. That analysis should include through. discussion anyl <br />justification of any geotechnical or geohydrological perimeter assumptions made, <br />regarding factors such as shear strength, spoil density, hydrogeological perimeters, <br />etc. <br />In view of the magnitude of the work which needs to be completed by the applicant, <br />I am pessemistic that the applicant will be able to complete analysis in time to <br />satisfy the 120 day deadline. I recommend, therefore, that the applicant be in- <br />s. <br />commence the necess <br />cc: Fred Banta <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.