My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10902
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:27 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:15:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/28/1982
Doc Name
BLUE RIBBON MINE REVIEW STATUS AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REVIEW COMMENTS FN C-047-81
From
MLR
To
BLUE RIBBON COAL COMPANY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. William S, Tate -2- December 30, 1981 <br />1. Drainage Areas <br />It appears that the boundaries drawn for watershed areas I and 3 on <br />Exhibit X do not correspond with the complete watershed boundaries. The <br />applicant must explain why the boundaries as shown do not conform with <br />the natural watershed areas. If there are diversion systems in these <br />watersheds, then complete designs, including contributing areas, peak <br />flows and complete ditch geometries must be submitted to the Division for <br />review, Otherwise, Exhibit X will need to be revised to accurately reflect <br />the boundaries of the natural watersheds. <br />2. Ditch Desi qns <br />The method used for ditch design is not described in sufficient detail, <br />The designs appear to have been generated by use of some variation on the <br />Chezy equation. The values of the Chezy coefficient and ditch slope <br />measurement are not given. In order to adequately review the proposed <br />ditch system for the Blue Ribbon mine, the applicant must supply the <br />following information to the Division: <br />a. Drainage Areas, <br />b. Design Return Period Storm and Peak Flow, <br />c. Ditch Geometries, <br />d. Estimated Depth of Flow in Reach of Least Slope, <br />e. Estimated Velocity in Reach o.` Greatest Slope, and <br />f. £xistiny and Proposed Ditch Lining <br />Blue Ribbon Coal Company is reminded of the requirement for 0.3 feet of <br />freeboard during passage of the 10-year, 29-hour storm (9.05.3(6)(b)). <br />3. Culvert Designs <br />The use of Manning's equation for culvert capacity estimation is inappro- <br />priate, Manning's equation is intended for vse in open channels with <br />steady uniform f1 ow. Amore appropriate method for sizing culverts <br />recommended by the Division is the nom graphic method developed by hydraulic <br />laboratories. Enclosed please find a copy of Chart S from the U. S. <br />Department of Transportation Federal Highway Department Publication, Hydraulic <br />Charts for the Selection of Highway Culverts, 1965. This chart assumes <br />inlet control which is generally the case in highway culvert crossings. <br />B.R. C. C. must provide the following for a1I culvert designs: <br />a, Drainage Area, <br />b. Design Return Period Storm and Peak Flow, <br />c. Culvert Diameter, and <br />d. Available Headwater <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.