My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10654
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10654
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:27:01 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:12:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/21/1984
Doc Name
PIT 1 SEDIMENT CONTROL GRASSY GAP MINE
From
MLRD
To
C THOMPSON
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiniiiiiiiii iii <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Getchea Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />MEMORANDUM <br />T0: D. Mathews <br />FROM: C. Thompson (~ ~ <br />DATE: August 21, 1984 <br />RE: Pit No. 1 Sediment Control - Grassy Gap Mine <br />1. The 25 year, 24 hour peak runoff has been underestimated. When accounting <br />for the equivalent drainage shape factor, Figure S-lA should be entered with <br />the equivalent drainage area not the real drainage area. <br />2. Calculations should be submitted showing appropriate sizing of the <br />emergency spillway for the pond and appropriate riprap sizing to protect from <br />erosion for the 25 year event. <br />3. The applicant must state in the revision the contour furrow spacing that <br />will be used. <br />4. Calculations should be submitted showing sizing of the contour furrows <br />required to contain the 10 year event and sediment yield. <br />5. The cover (C) factor used for the reclaimed area seems low based on <br />communication with Mike Savage. He and Dan Mathews surveyed Pit No. 1 for <br />cover and the average cover of grass and litter was found to be 52%. This <br />would give a C factor of 0.07. Therefore, further justification is needed of <br />the C factor used for the revision of 0.02. <br />6. Numerous typographic error are present in the calculations submitted. <br />These typos have made review of the submittal difficult. <br />CT/baw <br />Doc. No. 3631 <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.