APPCOR10641

• Permit No: C1996084
• IBM Index Class Name: Application Correspondence
• Doc Name: Initial adequacy review
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

I Y
• 2.05.5 *** 2.05.6(2) *** 3.02.2
4.06 •** 4.15 *** 4.16 *** 4.18
Dan
2.03 *** 2.05.3(1)-(3) *** 2.05.3(6)-(7)
2.05.4(2)(c) & (g) *** 2.05.6(1) *** 2.06
4.02 *** 4.03 *** 4.04 *** 4.07 *** 4.08 *** 4.14
4.17***4.19**+4.22*+*4.26
Jim
2.05.3(8) *** 4.09 *** 4.14

Please respond to each question as necessary. Include with responses 5 copies of text, exhibits,
maps, etc. as appropriate.
General Errors or Omissions (ICAG)
b~' 1. Under the Geology description, page 2.04-6 reference is made to the "1986 field drilling
program". Should this read 1996?
a1 't'" 1 2,/ Under the Geology description, Interburden, page 2.04-7 the term overburden is used.
\J~~~~~~,!>' Should this read interburden? This question also applies to Exhibit 6 text.
5
~ .~)t ~~~ ~ Under the Geology description, Underburden, the term overburden is used. Should this
~~+' p~ ~ read underburden? This question also applies to Exhibit 6 text.
~~~~ ~4. (~~ The autocad base maps indicate a odd, straight blue line at N 1,156,000E 3,208,000.
~•
o `b ~tv,~
+~~~ 5. o
~:~~,r 6• ~~
~~A"
., ~~`'
•
Is the text on page 2.04-30 which reads "material change specific conductance" correct?
What is the odd shape annotated in orange ink on the Mine Plan map approximately one
inch northeast of the azea labeled Surface Mine Supply Storage?
All maps aze required to be certified by a registered, professional engineer.
8. ©~ The value presented on page 2.05-100, as .00009 percent should read .009 percent.