My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10445
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10445
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:50 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:10:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/8/1982
Doc Name
ADDITIONAL CONCERNS RAISED DURING THE TBM PR C-048-81
From
MLRD
To
TRINIDAD BASING MINING INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ric Waco D Lamm <br />Gnvrr roar <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />DEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOl1ROES <br />D AL mlr oasc o~. E.r•uh. nn ~.io. <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON Director <br />... . ~.. <br />April 8, 1982 <br />Vance Mills <br />Trinidad Basin Mining Inc. <br />P.O. Bo:: 783 <br />Trinidad, Colorado 81082 <br />RD: Additional concerns raised during the TBA1 permit review (C-048-81j <br />Dear Mr. Mills: <br />The following constitutes additional concerns identified during the <br />course of the Division's review of the Trinidad Basin mine permit <br />application. The addressing and/or resolution of these items will be <br />necessary before the Division can issue a permit to 1'B1.1. <br />With respect to concerns identified in the March 16, ].982 correspondence, <br />TBM and American Materials have supplied responses to items 1-4. Responses <br />are still needed for items 5-8 and the additional land use information. <br />Topsoil-Kul es 2.04.9 and 4.06 <br />1. TBM will need to provide a soils map which is tl~e same scale as the <br />mine plan map. Phis map must contain all the .information which is <br />currently contained on ?tap IV-6. <br />2. The applicant needs to clarify the soil sample locations as presented <br />in Appendix C and Map IV-6. It is not evident whether the soil samples <br />analyzed are from the sample locations on the map. Additionally, there <br />were only six soil samples analyzed, though Ch ere were mine soil types <br />described. Further soil sampling may be required iF it is determined that <br />soil characteristics are suFfici.ently variable to worrnnt it. <br />3. I'he applicanC needs to discuss depths to which topsoil will be <br />redistributed nnrl nicChods of insuring that uniform .vul ndequaCc redisCrihution <br />has occurred. <br />4. Table V-3 needs to be updated and clarified. It cannot be determined <br />where material for topsoil stockpiles is coming from, and the topso.iling of <br />several ruts has not been addressed. <br /> <br />423 Cenfenn~al Rwldmn, 1373 Shnlmnn Sln~?i Donvr`r. Cr~lUt~rlr' An70A TCI 1303) 8r,~_g,-,,;~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.