Laserfiche WebLink
D. A Berry - 7 - December 4, 1996 <br />4.1.5 Material Stockpiles <br />DMG -Response accepted pending verification ojfrnal Colorado Department of <br />Transportation Highway Access permits. <br />4.3.2 Slope Stability <br />DMG -Resolution pending. Please forward the pertinent information as soon as <br />it is available. <br />BRL -The issue of using blow counts to deduce strength parameters will be <br />discussed our meeting on December 5'h. <br />71. DMG -Additional response is required Rejer to our November 18, 199ti letter, <br />regarding pending geotechnical concerns. <br />BRL - No response at this time. This issue will be discussed at a meeting with the DMG <br />on December 5th. <br />72. - 80. No response requ'ved. <br />81. BRL -The FWS issued its final biological opinion dated September 3, 1996 for the Bowie <br />No. 2 Mine. BRL paid a depletion charge of $1,558.27 to mitigate its speculated effect on <br />the endangered fishes in the Colorado River. On November 25, 1996 the FWS issued an <br />amendment to the final biological opinion for an additional 1.8 acre-foot depletion. BRL <br />paid $24.14 to mitigate the speculated effect of this additional depletion on the <br />endangered fishes in the Colorado River. Enclosed are espies of the final biological <br />opinion and the amendment to the final biological opinion to be inwrporated into the <br />permit in Volume III, Exhibit 9, Wildlife. Also enclosed is revised page 2.05-57 which <br />explains the estimated consumptive use of water at the Bowie No. 2 Mine. <br />82. No response required. <br />82a. DMG -This issue has been forward to Jim Pendleton for review. <br />83. - 90. No response required. <br />1.2 Mining Schedule and Rate of Subsidence <br />Paragraph 1; No response requved. <br />Paragraph 2; DMG -This issue has been referred to Jirn Pendleton for review. <br />91. No response required. <br />