My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10442
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10442
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:50 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:10:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/20/1981
Doc Name
letter forwarding comments concerning AVF
From
MLR
To
E B CRIBBS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~- <br />- Page 2 <br />Mr. Cribbs <br />March 20, 1981 <br />The neap must include the entire study area as defined in b1 previously. <br />She may they have submitted does not include enough adjacent areas nor does <br />it map downstream from the permit area. <br />3. Water Availability - Flood Irrigation <br />The existence of flood irrigation and the capability of the Land to be <br />flood irrigated must be established. AZl flood irrigated lands in or adjacent <br />to the permit area should be mapped. It should include any Lands that were <br />historically flood irrigated and the reason they were abandoned (if known). <br />To evaluate the capability of flood irrigation, a map or identification of <br />Lands in the region that are flood irrigated could be submitted. The identification <br />should include those lands with similar physiographic, agricultural, geologic, <br />climatic, hydrologic, soils and vegetation characteristics. <br />If other agencies or professionals do the AVF study or render opinions <br />that the applicant wants the Division to consider, the applicant must submit <br />the study information to allow the Division to verify the Finding. For example, <br />if Dorchester submits a letter from a professional that states that no alluvium <br />is present, we wi21 need to know how he arrived at that conclusion. (What <br />did the study area include? How was the survey conducted. What definitions, <br />guidelines, or assumptions were used? etc.) <br />If you have any questions or comments concerning this, please do not hesitate <br />to call me. <br />SincerelL,, <br />Carol Russell <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />/k <br />CC: R. A. Jackson <br />Pete Evans <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.