My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10328
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10328
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:43 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:09:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/14/1995
Doc Name
REPONSE TO 1/20/95 AND 1/24/95 ADEQUACY LETTERS
From
SCC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Tab 5 - Cultural .Resources <br /> <br /> <br />10. Documentation from BLM will be submitted as soon as it becomes <br />available. <br />11. No response required from SCC. <br />Tab 6 - aeoloav and Overburden Assessment <br />12. Exhibit 6-1 has been revised to :show probable landslide <br />deposits ranging from very old to active. These landslide <br />areas were identified by preliminary photo and topo <br />interpretive study. All landslide polygons in the permit area <br />will be verified by field study and analysis during the 1995 <br />field season. Pages 10 and 37, Tab 6 were revised to include <br />a brief discussion and reference for the landslide deposits. <br />13. Exhibit 6-1 has been revised to show the projected "Yoast" <br />syncline between the Sage Creek and Fish Creek anticlines. <br />14. Exhibit 6-4 has been revised to show the sampling area for <br />Wadge and wolf Creek spoil. The Wadge sampling plan is <br />designed to detect potentially unsuitable spoil from the <br />Lennox seam and associated shales. 'Phis area was delineated <br />on Exhibit 6-4 by referencing the 60-foot overburden isoline <br />shown on Exhibit 6-3. Text Page 34, Tab 6 and Page 4, Tab 21 <br />were revised to reference the spoil sampling areas shown on <br />Exhibit 6-4. <br />15. The sampling intensity for final graded spoil in the Wolf <br />Creek area at Yoast should be equal to the pattern currently <br />used at Seneca II Mine. SCC has revised Page 4, Tab 21 <br />indicating ~i 300-foot grid will be used. In the Wadge <br />sampling area shown on Exhibit 6-4, SCC will use a 500-foot <br />grid which is equal to the pattern currently used at Seneca <br />II-W Mine. <br />16. SCC proposes a minimum soil replacement thickness of 0.5 feet <br />along Roads A and B and in the facilities area in Section 8. <br />This thickness is sufficient in these areas because the soil <br />is being replaced over undisturbed subsoil and substratum <br />material. Ttie 0.5-foot minimum soil replacement is similar to <br />the thickness currently approved along the railroad at Hayden <br />Gulch Terminal, Inc. SCC proposes a minimum soil replacement <br />thickness of 1.0 feet over final graded spoil in the first <br />five-year mine block. This is identical to the soil <br />replacement thickness currently being used at Seneca II Mine. <br />Pages 23 and 24, Tab 21 were revised to incorporate the <br />minimum soil replacement thickness language. <br />• <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.