Laserfiche WebLink
• Response <br />Information. in response to this comment ~~ ill be collected follosin_ permit issuance. LCC <br />requests a stipulation on the permit requiring that this infonnatien be required prior to <br />disturbance. <br />Rule ~l.lq Backfillint and Grading <br />ISq \o change in scale alloying for o~erlav sax evidau. Funherntore. the PIT map depic[s <br />^ no [erracinR but cross sections do. This response is inadequate. <br />„,~y~.9~ Res~nse <br />IN ~ This will be prop ided in a future submittal. <br />13~. This response is also inadequate. Please refer to the original question. <br />\- Response <br />i~ Fi~ure'_.0~.-1-I 1 ~~ill be re~ ised to ti[ ~~i[h the location of till 1 on the P\[T map in a furore <br />submittal. <br />• Rule ~1.1~ Reve~etation <br />Under this section. all responses were found adequate exeep[ as listed bolos. <br />?El~ff.' Lorencito Coal Compam considers that no additional meaatres are necessan to assure <br />V~ protection of the grassland extended reference area. Lorenciro Coal Compam will need [o <br />v be aware that am ne~~ disturbances that «ould be proposed in the Lorencito Canyon <br />grassland area may be assessed with respect to Rules 4.1 ~.7(3)(c) and (dj. L`nless statistical <br />comparison are made of grassland communities in Cos' Cam on. Puer[ecito Cam on. Bonita <br />Canyon , alamosa Cam on. or any other srassland areas outside of the defined Lorencito <br />Cam on, these areas are not available for use as extended referencz arras. \o additional <br />response is necessan~ from Lorencito Coal Compam at this time. <br />Response <br />LCC understands that the extended grassland reference aria is only sithin the Lorencito <br />Cam on area. additional data sill be collected if other areas are proposed. <br />190. Lorencito Coal Contpam rectsed the technical success standard for sood~ stem densit.• in <br />the oak pinyon cege[atien qpe from 1000 steno acre to X00 stems acre Lorencito Coal <br />Cbmpam has provided nn explanation of the rationale for this proposed eduction. nor ha~'e <br />dtey provide an explanation of how the proposed standard will compl. s ith Rulz d. l ~.7('_). <br />The surface mine area h;u been proposed to be rep egetated to a grassland community and <br />?l <br />