Laserfiche WebLink
• Response <br />The permanent drainaaz; for the surface mine ~~ill be redesi~nzd usin_ rip-rap in a future <br />submitt <br />G~,~,~ ~.. The Division understands. at tlis time. a response is fonc~omin^_ Therefore. this response <br />p is inadequate. <br />1 Response <br />A study for the geotecltnical evaluation of the foundation areas of the MSH.A ponds is <br />attached. A text discussion on compaction will be provided in a inure submittal. The <br />results of this study will be provided after permit approval. <br />1d3. Pond information was modified across the board on EX l d-l ~ (~~hich .vas originally E\ l ~- <br />1 1). This information was reviewed in it's entirety along with Exhibit 1 ~ design infommation. <br />The tbllowing problems were noted: <br />R1 Portal <br />• b~t' ~l The Dig ision notes that no drainage plan for the lL poral have been submitted. Our <br />understanding is that this portal is planned for the second five year temt. <br />DY 1}) On Figure E`t 16-3A. are ditches D7B\D7C and CDR dirzctl_~ adjacent? If so. <br />please delineate of the tieure. <br />~ c) CWD ditches should bz labeled on the figure using the same terminology as Table <br />l ~-3. <br />Coal loadout <br />d) The coal loadout pond is generally square. A rectan_ular pond. ~~ ith the inlet as far <br />e ~ /~ away from the outlet is recommended and is the assumption that tiEDCAD- is usine <br />•_~,, in [he modeling. The Division recommends a ?:1 lem~tl>/«idth ratio for pond <br />fA'•_ construction. <br />~ e) No table depictine design data was located. <br />j i~ The emergency spillsva~ crest elevation is in error on E\ I ~-1 q for the coal loadout. <br />b`~ ' (6331 should be 6631). <br /> <br />26 <br />