APPCOR10255 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• -10- 4. Within 2 months after the submission of the above requested vegetative information required in special stipulations 3, the applicant shall provide to the regulatory authority a detailed description of methodologies and criteria used in establishing new calving areas. The applicant must also provide with this submittal a detailed description of a monitoring program to evaluate the success of the new calving area. 5. Six months after approval, the applicant shall submit for approval of the regulatory authority, a narrative of the techniques and devices to be used to establish the necessary watering areas for elk. The plan shall also include a map showing the location of the watering area in relation to elk calving grounds. 6. Every 6 months for the life of the mine, the applicant shall provide data collected during elk monitoring programs to the regulatory authority. If it becomes apparent through monitoring of elk movement that haul roads are interfering with migration of the elk, the applicant shall use fencing approved by the regulatory authority. The fencing shall be employed to minimize impacts of roads during migration periods. 7. If any adverse impacts to fish or wi]dlife are discovered during the proposed monitoring programs, the applicant must, in consultation with regulatory authority, take appropriate measures to mitigate the impacts. All six stipulations have been responded to. As required by MLRD stipulation 3 an inspection of the sage grouse ]ek area was conducted with all representatives except the OSM. The lek identified in the permit as a sage grouse lek was reidentified by Clait Braun of the DOW as a sharp tail grouse strutting ground. It was also determined during the joint inspection that little of the habitat in Eckman Park is suitable for sage grouse. Therefore, no additional action is required by the applicant. The data submitted in response to OSM stipulation 3 showed no significant differences in elk calving ground aspen communities on soil types 8D and 70 with respect to cover, productivity and diversity. In response to OSM stipulation 4, the operator conducted an extensive study of elk calving in the adjacent areas. Results of the study showed that the area used by calving elk was much larger than originally thought. Therefore, rather than establishing new calving areas, an extensive monitoring program was implemented by the applicant in cooperation with the Colorado Division of Wildlife to study elk calving behavior in the area. The monitoring program is detailed in a July 1, 19II0 letter form Jack R. Grieb to Marvin Pearson. CYCC is continuing with the monitoring program and submitting annual reports.