Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-2- <br />Stipulation No_ 23 <br />failing a response. St~ulation No. 23 must be retained as orlglnaily drafted. <br />Stipulation No. 24 <br />The applicant's respan~ to the proposed stipulation fails to detail <br />techniques for tfie repsting of subsidence monitoring of potentially affected <br />structures Witfiin tfie:Rmlt area, such as the Thompson Ranch and the <br />Dorchester Waste ?i]e.. The applicant also neglected to label the three <br />Florence ~raterline sub#dence monuments on the amended "Subsidence Monitoring <br />Plan° map_ Failing renlutlon of these matters and possibly related impact of <br />Stipulations 22 and 23.I must recommend that Stipulation No. 24 be retained <br />in your final findingsdocument as orlglnaily drafted. <br />StlDUlation No. 2b <br />Failing a response to:4lpulation No. 26 as originally drafted, I must <br />recommend its retenttotin your final findings document. <br />/mt <br />cc: Ed 8lscfioff <br /> <br />Doc. No_ 9549 <br />