Laserfiche WebLink
<br />described in 7'ab 20. These erosion control efforts will be <br />practiced until the reclaimed drainage is stabilized. <br />SCC also ran the SEDCAD model using the 20.15 cfs value. The <br />drainage remained stable using this higher value. <br />71. This comment was a duplication of comment No. 36 under Tab 13- <br />Facilities. Please refer to the response for comment No. 36 <br />which addresses the concerns of the Division. <br />Tab 21 - Minesoil 1leconstruotion <br />`~, 72. As specified :in the title of Table 1 (Page 9), Footnote 2 of <br />y' Table 1 (Page 11), the "Soil Salvage Techniques" text on Page <br />17, and the title of Table 2 (Page :18) , the proposed soil <br />salvage area for the life-of-mine disturbance area at Yoast <br />Mine is presented in Table 1. The soil salvage and volume <br />information for the first five-year permit term is presented <br />in Table 2. Both tables are unique and the information is <br />accurate as presented. <br />73. As stated in responses to Comments 31., 68, and 69, SCC will <br />provide the Division with proper documentation for retaining <br />Haul Roads A and B as permanent postmine features. The <br />• landowner consent forms will be provid~=_d by March 15, 1995 and <br />will be included in Appendix 22-2 of 'Pab 22. <br />~./ (L 74a. SCC proposes using a pH value of less than 5.0 as unsuitable <br />tt`"' V :~/ per the WDEQ guideline. <br />~/b. SCC proposes using a selenium level of greater than 0.15 ppm <br />Q for determining unsuitable overburden, underburden, and <br />regraded spoil strata. This value i.s recommended by USDI- <br />OSMRE. Solt:anpour and Workman (1'380) indicated AB-DTPA <br />extracted about 1.5 times more Se than hot water from mine <br />soils and overburden materials. <br />~c. SCC recommends using the 1.0 ppm thre:;hold value to determine <br />unsuitable molybdenum concentrations per MDSL and WDEQ <br />guidelines. <br />The followinc~ pages were revised to incorporate the changes <br />specified above: Tab 6, Pages 23, 25 to 28, and 36; Tab 6, <br />Appendix 6-3, Pages 6-3-1 and 6-3-3; and Tab 21, Pages 1 and <br />2. <br />~~8 N/A Tab 21, Page:> 9, 10, and 11 were revised to revise soil map <br />~ unit areas to be affected in then life-of-mine topsoil <br />disturbance area. The revised permit boundary caused the <br />topsoil disturbance area to decrease by 2.8 acres. <br />Tab 22 - Reveaetat;ion Plan <br />75. Landowner comments and consent forms will be included in <br />Appendix 22-2, Tab 22 of the PAP. Copies of the sample <br />18 <br />